Feasibility of implementing rapid oral fluid HIV testing in an urban University Dental Clinic: a qualitative study
- M Katherine Hutchinson†1Email author,
- Nancy VanDevanter†1,
- Joan Phelan†2,
- Daniel Malamud†2,
- Anthony Vernillo†2,
- Joan Combellick1 and
- Donna Shelley†2
© Hutchinson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 8 August 2011
Accepted: 7 March 2012
Published: 9 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mehrdad Askarian|
|27 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Metsch|
|8 Dec 2011||Author responded||Author comments - M. Katherine Hutchinson|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|8 Dec 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Feb 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Metsch|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|7 Mar 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6831-12-11|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.