Evaluating components of dental care utilization among adults with diabetes and matched controls via hurdle models
© Chaudhari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 30 August 2011
Accepted: 18 June 2012
Published: 9 July 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|30 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bjorn Soderfeldt|
|2 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ira Lamster|
|4 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Girvan Burnside|
|23 May 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Monica Chaudhari|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 May 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jun 2012||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jul 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6831-12-20|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.