Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Screening and detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) high-risk strains HPV16 and HPV18 in saliva samples from subjects under 18 years old in Nevada: a pilot study

  • Colton Flake1,
  • Jamal Arafa2,
  • Alex Hall3,
  • Eryn Ence4,
  • Katherine Howard4 and
  • Karl Kingsley4Email author
BMC Oral Health201212:43

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-43

Received: 8 February 2012

Accepted: 18 October 2012

Published: 22 October 2012



Human papillomaviruses (HPV) are oncogenic and mainly associated with cervical cancers. Recent evidence has demonstrated HPV infection in other tissues, including oral epithelia and mucosa. Although a recent pilot study provided new information about oral HPV status in healthy adults from Nevada, no information was obtained about oral HPV prevalence among children or teenagers, therefore, the goal of this study is to provide more detailed information about oral prevalence of high-risk HPV among children and teenagers in Nevada.


This retrospective study utilized previously collected saliva samples, obtained from pediatric dental clinic patients (aged 2 – 11) and local school district teenagers (aged 12-17) for high-risk HPV screening (n=118) using qPCR for quantification and confirmation of analytical sensitivity and specificity.


A small subset of saliva samples were found to harbor high-risk HPV16 (n=2) and HPV18 (n=1), representing a 2.5% of the total. All three were obtained from teenage males, and two of these three samples were from White participants.


Although this retrospective study could not provide correlations with behavioral or socioeconomic data, this project successfully screened more than one hundred saliva samples for high-risk HPV, confirming both HPV16 and HPV18 strains were present in a small subset. With increasing evidence of oral HPV infection in children, this study provides critical information of significant value to other dental, medical, oral and public health professionals who seek to further an understanding of oral health and disease risk in pediatric populations.


Human papillomavirus Saliva Oral screening


The human papillomaviruses (HPV) encompass a closely related family of DNA viruses, which are capable of integrating into the human genome to drive transformation of infected epithelia[14]. Much of the epidemiological evidence for HPV-driven carcinogenesis, as well as the biological mechanisms, have been derived from studies of cervical cancers[57] that isolated high-risk HPV from both adeno- and squamous cell carcinomas[69]. Although high-risk HPV drives the transformation and malignancy process of nearly all cervical cancers, HPV infection is now known to modulate epithelial transformation in breast, lung, penile, anal, and also oral tissues[1020].

The primary risk factors for oral carcinogenesis are tobacco and alcohol use, although new lines of evidence now suggest HPV may also be an independent risk factor[1723]. The higher prevalence of high-risk HPV strains in pre-cancerous and cancerous oropharyngeal tumors suggests that HPV may preferentially infect developing or established cancers, thereby modulating carcinogenic progression and ultimately influencing health outcomes[2426]. In fact, some evidence has suggested that high-risk HPV infection may be associated with improved response to treatment and higher survival rates[2729], while conflicting reports have demonstrated significantly decreased patient survival[3032] or have observed no discernable and statistically significant effects[33].

Despite the conflicting nature of these results, it is clear that HPV may be involved in modulating tumor responsiveness and carcinogenic progression, therefore many of these studies have provided valuable epidemiological information regarding which high-risk HPV strains are most often implicated in these cases[3436]. These studies have revealed HPV16, and HPV18 to a lesser extent, accounted for the overwhelming majority (71-94.7%) of high-risk oral HPV detected[17, 18, 2123, 3436]. Moreover, new evidence now suggests that these specific high-risk HPV strains (HPV16 and HPV18), may initiate oral carcinogenesis among the smaller fraction of oral cancer patients who do not consume alcohol or use tobacco[37, 38].

Based upon the findings of oral HPV in non-tobacco and non-alcohol associated oral cancers, other recent efforts have focused more specifically to evaluate oral HPV prevalence and transmission within healthy populations, which also confirmed that HPV16 and HPV18 were the most commonly detected oral high-risk HPV strains[3941] among healthy adults.

To this end, a recent pilot study evaluating oral HPV among healthy adults was performed in Nevada[42], a state recently documented with rising rates of oropharyngeal cancers, in stark contrast to the declining rates observed in neighboring states and the US more generally[43, 44]. This study revealed the presence of high-risk strain HPV16, but not HPV18, among females and minorities, the only population subgroups demonstrated to have rising orpharyngeal cancer rates – despite the overall declining rates observed within the general population[4547]. This study utilized a saliva-based screening procedure, part of a growing trend towards less invasive methodologies, such as oral lavage- and saliva-based screenings, to analyze oral HPV status among healthy adult patients[4851].

Although prevalence rates ranged widely, these studies have suggested that oral HPV infection may be increasing, not only among adults, but more specifically among younger adults, teenagers, and children[5254].To this end, some studies have examined oral HPV in children or adolescents, although many of these focused primarily on children with underlying medical conditions, such as co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)[5557]. Most other research, however, has focused more specifically on elucidating the role of vertical HPV transmission in newborns, demonstrating the potential to acquire high-risk HPV during the delivery and birthing process, although these infections typically resolve[5863].

However, new evidence is emerging that demonstrated high-risk oral HPV infection in normal, healthy children, with the highest rates observed among children under 7 years old (7.9%-8.7%), and declining rates observed among healthy adolescents (13-20 years old; 5.1%-5.2%) and healthy adults (3.5%)[64, 65]. These observations may suggest that oral HPV infection may occur through close personal contact with family members or through contact with fomites and other vectors at daycare centers, preschool or in primary education settings, with most children immunologically competent to resolve these infections[66]. However, some infections may persist and their contribution to the development of oral cancers and other pathologies remains unclear.

Although a pilot study was recently conducted to evaluate oral HPV status, this involved only healthy adult patients - with no information obtained about oral HPV prevalence among children or teenagers. Based upon the previous evidence demonstrating some level of oral HPV infection in healthy children and adolescents, combined with the lack of data about this population more specifically, the goal of this current study is to provide more detailed information about prevalence of high-risk HPV strains HPV16 and HPV18 in the oral cavity of children and teenagers in Nevada.


The proportion of female and male specimens from the study sample was not statistically different from the overall proportions within the local community of Clark County, Nevada (Table1). More specifically, the percentage of females and males in the sample was approximately equal (51.7% and 48.3%, respectively), which was not significantly different than the local area population (p = 0.7051). The proportion of minority (non-White) samples was much greater in the study sample (70.3%) than in the local population (39.1%), which was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Although data from the local population were unavailable for age-specific comparisons, the study sample was comprised more from younger children (ages 2-11: 59.3%) than from adolescents and teenagers (12-17: 40.7%).
Table 1

Demographic analysis of study participants


CCSD (n=48)

UNLV-SDM (n=70)

Total sample (n=118)

Clark County population

Statistical analysis



n = 30 (62.5%)

n = 31 (44.3%)

n = 61 (51.7%)

n = 969,781 (49.7%)

χ2 = 0.17849 d.f. = 1


n = 18 (37.5%)

n = 39 (55.7%)

n = 57 (48.3%)

n = 981,488 (50.3%)

p = 0.7051



n = 12 (25%)

n = 23 (32.9%)

n = 35 (29.7%)

n = 1,188,323 (60.9%)

χ2 = 28.3634 d.f. = 1


n = 36 (75%)

n = 47 (67.1%)

n = 83 (70.3%)

n = 762,946 (39.1%)

p < 0.0001



n = 0 (0%)

n = 70 (100%)

n = 70 (59.3%)




n = 48 (100%)

n = 0 (0%)

n = 48 (40.7%)


Detailed analysis of saliva samples revealed some variability between cell counts, DNA concentration and DNA purity between samples (Figure1). Cell counts varied between a 0.8 – 2.3 x 106 cell/mL, which were further categorized into low (0.8 – 1.4 x 106) and high (1.6 – 2.3 x 106) cell counts. DNA was successfully isolated from all saliva samples, with the average DNA concentration for samples observed at 842.7 ng/μL. Samples from each cohort (CCSD, UNLV) with cell counts in the low category were found to have lower average concentrations of DNA than samples from the same cohort with cell counts in the high category. Absorbance measurements and A260/A280 ratio analysis confirmed the purity of DNA isolates, which was approximately equal between cohorts, as well as between samples in the low- and high-cell count categories.
Figure 1

Saliva sample analysis: cell count, DNA isolation and purity. A) Following centrifugation and cell resuspension in saline, cell number for each sample was determined revealing three-fourths of the UNLV samples were observed to have lower cell counts (0.8-1.4 x 106 cells/mL) while only one-third of CCSD sample were estimated* to have lower cell counts. B) DNA concentrations were found to be higher from the high-cell count samples within each cohort (CCSD: 859.4 and 707.1 ng/μL, respectively; UNLV: 886.3 and 910.2 ng/μL, respectively). DNA purity averaged between 1.71 and 1.82. C) Equal concentrations of extracted DNA (1 μL) was screened using GAPDH, which revealed no considerable variation in band intensity between cohorts of samples from high- and low-cell count categories.

Samples of extracted DNA were subsequently screened for the presence of HPV16 and HPV18 using PCR (Figure2). This screening yielded three HPV-positive samples (n = 3/118), representing 2.5% of the total screened. Two of these samples (S5, S38) harbored HPV16 DNA and one was found to harbor HPV18 DNA (S7). Processing of DNA samples using qPCR provided quantitative assessments, as well as measurements of sensitivity and specificity. Analysis of copy number per genome for the housekeeping gene (β-actin) for the HPV-positive (range: 25 - 40 copies/genome) and HPV-negative samples (4 – 93 copies/genome) revealed values that were well above the cutoff value (> 0.1 copies/genome). Results of qPCR analysis revealed copy numbers of HPV-positive samples (range: 150 – 880 copies/genome) that were significantly higher than HPV-negative samples (range: 0.00148 – 0.0000016 copies/genome), which could be distinguished using the cutoff value (> 0.001 copies/genome). These analyses revealed no false positives or false negatives, demonstrating sufficient sensitivity and specificity to ascertain the proportion of true HPV-positive samples (3/118 or 2.5%; 3/3 or 100%) and true HPV-negative samples (115/118 or 97.5%; 115/115 or 100%).
Figure 2

Saliva sample screening: analysis of qPCR HPV results. A) Three samples were found to harbor HPV DNA: HPV16-positive samples (S5, S38); One sample was HPV-positive (S7). B) qPCR analysis revealed HPV-positive samples had values well above the established cutoff value (> 0.001 copies/genome). C) All three HPV-positive samples were male, representing 2.5% of the total (n = 118). Two of the three HPV-positive samples were from White participants. All three HPV-positive samples were from the CCSD cohort (ages: 12-17); Both HPV16-positive samples were obtained from 14-year old participants, while the HPV18-positive sample was obtained from a 15-year old.

Although the relatively small proportion of HPV-positive samples does not allow for more broad inferences, a descriptive analysis of the demographic information regarding these samples revealed that all three were derived from males (n=3/57 or 5.3%) and none were derived from females. The two HPV16-positive samples were collected from White participants aged 14 (n = 2/35 or 5.7%), while the HPV18-positive sample was collected from a non-White participant aged 15 (n = 1/83 or 1.2%). All three HPV-positive samples were from the CCSD (teenage) cohort (n = 3/48 or 6.25%), while none were observed in the UNLV-SDM (pediatric) cohort (n = 70).


The main goal of this study was to screen normal healthy children and teenagers in Nevada for the presence of high-risk oral HPV. This retrospective analysis used existing saliva samples, collected from pediatric dental patients and local school district teenagers, to obtain novel data from this previously untested juvenile population thereby complementing the ever-growing body of evidence regarding oral HPV prevalence in children. Most importantly, these data have suggested an oral prevalence of high-risk HPV stains of approximately 2.5%.

Recent studies of healthy adults have found similar prevalence rates, ranging between 3.1 and 5%[40, 41]. In fact, the recent pilot study of healthy adults in Nevada reported oral HPV in 2.6% of 151 cancer-free patients[42]. The results of the current study were markedly different, however, because two of the three HPV-positive samples were obtained from Whites and all were from males – whereas the prior study of adults found oral HPV among females and minorities only. Other evidence has suggested that although samples from females and males had similar rates of oral HPV (56 and 44%, respectively), the HPV-negative samples from that study were overwhelmingly female (82%) – providing some evidence of a possible male, gender-specific phenomenon similar to the current study results[67]. Although there are many possible explanations, such as the transient nature of the local population, many other factors such as stress, diet, income, poverty, socioeconomic status, and oral HPV exposure may affect different racial groups and both genders in similar ways.

This study represents a significant turning point in public health efforts to elucidate oral HPV detection in a geographic area known for higher than average (and previously increasing) rates of oropharyngeal cancers[43, 44]. However, this study had several limitations that must be acknowledged. First, the retrospective nature of this study limited the inferences that could be made, unlike other recent prospective studies of oral HPV in children and adolescents[6468]. In addition, no detailed behavioral or socioeconomic data were available, such as parental income or smoking behaviors, due to the nature of this retrospective pilot study. It is hoped that future investigations involving oral HPV will provide additional insights with more detailed behavioral information, as well as data regarding housing, education, income and other socioeconomic indicators[6771].


This project successfully screened saliva samples for high-risk HPV, confirming both HPV16 and HPV18 strains were present in a small subset. Although previous work has focused on oral HPV transmission from mother to newborn during birth and while nursing[5863, 68], there is growing evidence to suggest that following the perinatal period, oral HPV transmission through close personal contact, such as shared eating utensils, toys, kissing and bathing may account for oral HPV transmission (primarily HPV16) in children and adolescents[7275]. This study, therefore, provides critical information of significant value to other dental, medical, oral and public health professionals who seek to further an understanding of high-risk HPV prevalence among children as part of a broader understanding of oral health and disease risk in pediatric populations.


Sample size

Given the known prevalence of high-risk oral HPV in the previous study that screened healthy adults within this geographic area, the appropriate sample size was calculated using the following formula: n = Z 2 P (1 – P) / d 2, where n = sample size, Z = Z statistic for a level of confidence, P = expected prevalence, and d = precision[76, 77]. Using the 95% level of confidence, the Z value was determined to be 1.96; Using the previous proportion/prevalence of high-risk HPV of 2.6%, the P value was set as P = 0.026; The value for d should be calculated at 0.5 (P), resulting in a value for d = 0.013. Using these inputs, the minimum sample size for this study was calculated to be n = 75.

Human subjects

The protocol for this study titled “Retrospective Evaluation of Microbial Presence in Existing Saliva Repository: A PCR-Based Molecular Survey of Oral Microbial Populations from Existing Saliva Samples” was filed, amended, and approved by the UNLV Office of Research Integrity – Human Subjects (OPRS#1104-3801M) on May 10, 2011. The existing saliva samples were collected during two previous studies within the UNLV School of Dental Medicine (SDM) during 2009-2010. Saliva samples collected from a prior study of teenagers (14-15 years old) were derived from a convenience sample of selected schools within the Clark County, Nevada School District (CCSD; n=48); originally obtained for the purpose of surveying levels of oral cariogenic bacteria. Saliva samples collected from young children (2-11 years old) were obtained from a convenience sample within the UNLV-SDM pediatric dental clinic (n=70); originally obtained for the purpose of screening for heavy metal (lead or Pb) burden. In brief, for the original saliva sample collections at CCSD and UNLV-SDM, parents and subjects were recruited onsite. Inclusion criteria: Informed Consent/Parent Permission was required and conducted onsite, as well as an Assent to Participate in Research for all children over the age of seven who were capable of reading. Exclusion criteria: subjects younger than seven years of age, subjects that declined to participate, and subjects with parents who declined to participate. Each sample was assigned a unique, randomly-generated number to prevent research bias, with the only demographic information regarding the saliva specimens: gender, age, and ethnicity of the original study participant. This current project was a retrospective analysis of these two collections of saliva samples; the total combined sample size for this study was n = 118.

Saliva collection protocol

In brief, subjects who agreed to participate were given a small, sterile saliva collection container, 50 mL sterile polypropylene tube (Fisher Scientific: Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA). Participants were then asked to chew on a small piece of paraffin wax for one minute and then to expectorate, in accordance with the previous pilot study protocol[42]; sample volumes varied from approximately 50 μL to 2.5 μL. Samples were stored on ice until transport to a biomedical laboratory for analysis. Each saliva sample was assigned a unique, randomly-generated number to prevent research bias. Demographic information regarding the sample was concurrently collected, which consisted of age, gender, and ethnicity only.

Cell counting and DNA isolation

All samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 2,100 g (RCF) and the cell pellet washed with 1X phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (HyClone: Logan, Utah, USA) and resuspended in 5 mL of 1X PBS. Cell number was determined using Trypan Blue (Fisher Scientific: Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA) using a Zeiss Axiovert 40 inverted microscope (Carl Ziess, Inc: Thornwood, New York, USA) and a hemacytometer (Fisher Scientific: Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA). To determine if any samples harbored the HPV virus, DNA was isolated from the saliva sample using a minimum of 3.5 x 105 cells using the GenomicPrep DNA isolation kit (Amersham Biosciences: Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), using the procedure recommended by the manufacturer as previously described[12, 42, 78, 79]. DNA purity was calculated using ratio measurements of absorbance at 260 and 280 nm (A260/A280 ratio between 1.7 and 2.0).

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

DNA from each sample was then used to perform PCR with the Fisher exACTGene complete PCR kit (Fisher Scientific: Fair Lawn, New Jersey, USA) and a Mastercycler gradient thermocycler (Eppendorf: Hamburg, Germany) using the following primers for HPV16[12, 78], HPV18[12, 78, 79], and glyceraldehyde- 3- phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH)[80] (SeqWright: Houston, Texas, USA):







One μg of template DNA was used for each reaction. The initial denaturation step ran for three minutes at 94°C. A total of 30 amplification cycles were run, consisting of 30 second denaturation at 94°C, 60 seconds of annealing at 58°C, and 30 seconds of extension at 72°C. Final extension was run for five minutes at 72°C. The PCR reaction products were separated by gel electrophoresis using Reliant 4% NuSieve® 3:1 Plus Agarose gels (Lonza: Rockland, Maine, USA). Bands were visualized by UV illumination of ethidium-bromide-stained gels and captured using a Kodak Gel Logic 100 Imaging System and 1D Image Analysis Software (Eastman Kodak: Rochester, New York, USA).

Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

DNA samples were then processed using qPCR to provide more specific and sensitive quantification. Primers and probes were designed using Roche Universal Probe library (UPL) assay design software to amplify the region overlapping E6 and E7 gene sequence of HPV16 (GenBank accession no. K02718) and the human β-actin housekeeping gene (GenBank accession no. M10277). These primers were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Missouri, USA) and probes from Roche Applied Science (Indianapolis, Indiana, USA).

HPV16 E6/E7 forward primer 5′-CAACTGATCTCTACTGTTATGAGCAA-3′, HPV16 E6/E7 reverse primer 5′-CCAGCTGGACCATCTATTTCA-3′, HPV16 E6/E7 hydrolysis “Taqman” probe 5′-(fam)-AGGAGGAG-(dark quencher dye)-3′ (UPL probe #63) was used to amplify the 73 base pair (bp) region between the 535 nucelotide (nt) position and 607 nt position. HPV18 E7 forward primer 5′-GACTCAGAGGAAGGAAAACGATGAAA, HPV18 E7 reverse primer 5′-GTGACGTTGTGGTTCGGCT; HPV18 E7 probe 5′-TGGAGTTAATCATCAACATTTACCA was used to amplify the 25 bp region between the 715 and 739 nt position. Human β-actin forward primer 5′-GTGGGGTCCTGTGGTGTG-3′, human β-actin 5′-GAAGGGGACAGGCAGTGA-3′, human β-actin hydrolysis “Taqman” probe 5′-(fam)-GGGAGCTG-(dark quencher dye)-3′ (UPL probe #24) amplified the 61 bp region between 2642 nt position and 2702 nt position.

The real-time reaction mixture was prepared in a LightCycler® 480 multiwell Plate 96 containing 1x LightCycler® 480 Probes Master (Roche Applied Sciences: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA), 1 μM of each respective primer set (forward and reverse), 0.2 μM of respective probe, and 2 μl of DNA template; in a 20 μl final reaction volume. The probes master mix contained reaction buffer, dNTP mix (including dUTP in place of dTTP), 3.2 mM MgCl2, and Taq DNA polymerase. The real-time PCR assay was performed on a LightCycler 480 system (Roche Applied Sciences: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA) with the following cycle parameters: pre-incubation for initial enzyme activation at 95°C for 10 minutes, followed by 45 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds (ramp rate 4.4°C/second), 60°C for 30 seconds (ramp rate 2.2°C/second) and 72°C for 1 second (ramp rate 4.4°C/second). Following amplification phase, a cooling step was performed at 40°C for 30 seconds (ramp rate of 2.2°C/ second). Acquisition of the fluorescence signal was performed using Mono Hydrolysis Probe setting (465-510 nm) following the 72°C extension phase of each cycle. All samples were carried out in triplicate.

The CaSki (American Type Culture Collection; Manassas, Virginia, USA) cervical adenocarcinoma cell line was used to develop standard curves for both the HPV16 (600 copies/genome) and GAPDH (2 copies/genome) genes. The GH354 (American Type Culture Collection; Manassas, Virginia, USA) cervical adenocarcinoma cell line was used to develop the standard curves for HPV18 (200 copies/genome). DNA extracted from CaSki and GH354 cells were serially diluted tenfold starting at 50 ng to 0.0005 ng[81] Quantification was achieved using Cycle Threshold (CT) measured with the second derivative maximum method (LightCycler 480 Software version; Roche Applied Sciences: Indianapolis, Indiana, USA). Saliva samples > 0.001 copy/genome were considered HPV positive. Specificity analysis was performed on qPCR assay against HPV18 and found to be 100% specific (data not shown).

Statistical evaluation

Sensitivity and specificity were calculated as the proportion of true positives and true negatives (cutoff value >0.001 copies/genome), respectively. Following the acquisition of saliva samples and HPV screening results, demographic information from the samples were compared with the overall demographic profile of the local population using a chi-square (χ2) test, to determine if any characteristic (gender, race, age) was different than expected among the subjects evaluated in this study (n = 118). A probability level of alpha (α) = 0.05 was used to determine statistical significance.



Human papillomavirus


Deoxyribonucleic acid


United States


Polymerase chain reaction


Office for the Protection of Human Research Subjects


Clark County Nevada - School District


University of Nevada Las Vegas - School of Dental Medicine


Relative centrifugal force


Phosphate-buffered saline


Glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase


Quantitative polymerase chain reaction


Base pair




Deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate


2-Deoxyuridine triphosphate


Deoxythymidine triphosphate.



The authors would like to thank the UNLV School of Community Health Sciences and UNLV-SDM Department of Biomedical Sciences, Office for Research, and Advanced Education Program in Pediatric Dentistry for providing the supplies and reagents for this initial pilot study.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Advanced Education in Pediatric Dentistry, University of Nevada, Las Vegas – School of Dental Medicine
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Nevada, Las Vegas – School of Community Health Sciences
University of Nevada, Las Vegas – School of Life Sciences
Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Nevada, Las Vegas – School of Dental Medicine


  1. Zhou W, Tyring SK, Brysk M, Chan T: Immortalization of differentiated human keratinocytes by human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 DNA. J Dermat Sci. 1996, 13: 140-152. 10.1016/S0923-1811(96)00520-8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. zur Hausen H: Papillomaviruses in human cancers. Proc Assoc Am Physicians. 1999, 111 (6): 581-587. 10.1046/j.1525-1381.1999.99723.x. ReviewView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. zur Hausen H: Papillomaviruses and cancer: from basic studies to clinical application. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002, 2 (5): 342-350. 10.1038/nrc798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. McCance DJ: Human papillomaviruses and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1986, 823: 195-205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Walboomers JMM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJF, Peto J, Meijer CJLM, Munoz N: Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999, 189: 12-19. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, Munoz N, Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus types in invasive cervical cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer. 2003, 88: 63-73. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600688.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Kalantari M, Blennow E, Hagmar B, Johansson B: Physical state of HPV16 and chromosomal mapping of the integrated form in cervical carcinomas. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2001, 10 (1): 46-54. 10.1097/00019606-200103000-00008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Biron VL, Côté DW, Seikaly H: Oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma and human papillomavirus-associated cancers in women: epidemiologic evaluation of association. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011, 40 (Suppl 1): S65-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Tornesello ML, Losito S, Benincasa G, Fulciniti F, Botti G, Greggi S, Buonaguro L, Buonaguro FM: Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes and HPV16 variants and risk of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. Gynecol Oncol. 2011, 121 (1): 32-42. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kan C-Y, Iacopetta BJ, Lawson JS, Whitaker NF: Identification of human papillomavirus DNA sequences in human breast cancer. Br J Cancer. 2005, 93: 946-948. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602778.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Amarante MK, Watanabe MA: The possible involvement of virus in breast cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2009, 135 (3): 329-337. 10.1007/s00432-008-0511-2. Epub 2008 Nov 14View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kingsley K, Zuckerman J, Davis M, Matteucci M, Knavel A, Rinehart J, Tran V, Woyciehowsky D, Jenkins P, Yu R, Nguyen DH, O’Malley S: Induction of Differential Growth in vitro by High-risk Human Papillomavirus in Human Breast Cancer Cell Lines is Associated with Caspase Dysregulation. J Cancer Sci Ther. 2009, 1 (2): 62-71. 10.4172/1948-5956.1000010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Rezazadeh A, Laber DA, Ghim SJ, Jenson AB, Kloecker G: The role of human papilloma virus in lung cancer: a review of the evidence. Am J Med Sci. 2009, 338 (1): 64-7. 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181a393ba.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Miralles-Guri C, Bruni L, Cubilla AL, Castellsagué X, Bosch FX, de Sanjosé S: Human papillomavirus prevalence and type distribution in penile carcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2009, 62 (10): 870-878. 10.1136/jcp.2008.063149. Epub 2009 Aug 25View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Pow-Sang MR, Ferreira U, Pow-Sang JM, Nardi AC, Destefano V: Epidemiology and natural history of penile cancer. Urology. 2010, 76 (2 Suppl 1): S2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Williams GR, Talbot IC: Anal carcinoma–a histological review. Histopathology. 1994, 25 (6): 507-16. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb01370.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Shukla S, Bharti AC, Mahata S, Hussain S, Kumar R, Hedau S, Das BC: Infection of human papillomaviruses in cancers of different human organ sites. Indian J Med Res. 2009, 130 (3): 222-33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gillison ML, Koch WM, Capone RB, Spafford M, Westra WH, Wu L, Zahurak ML, Daniel RW, Viglione M, Symer DE, Shah KV, Sidransky D: Evidence for a causal association between human papillomavirus and a subset of head and neck cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000, 92: 675-677. 10.1093/jnci/92.9.675.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Miller CS, Johnstone BM: Human papillomavirus as a risk factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis, 1982-1997. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2001, 91: 622-635.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. van Houten VM, Snijders PJ, van den Brekel MW, Kummer JA, Meijer CJ, van Leeuwen B, Denkers F, Smeele LE, Snow GB, Brakenhoff RH: Biological evidence that human papillomaviruses are etiologically involved in a subgroup of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 2001, 93: 232-235. 10.1002/ijc.1313.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrero R, Castellsague X, Pawlita M, Lissowska J, Kee F, Balaram P, Rajkumar T, Sridhar H, Rose B, Pintos J, Fernandez L, Idris A, Jose Sanchez M, Nieto A, Talamini R, Tavani A, Bosch FX, Reidel U, Snijders PJF, Meijer CJLM, Viscidi R, Munoz N, Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus and oral cancer: The International Agency for Research on Cancer multicenter study. J Natl Cancer I. 2003, 95: 1772-1783. 10.1093/jnci/djg107.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2005, 14: 467-475. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-04-0551.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Syrjanen S: Human papillomavirus (HPV) in head and neck cancer. J Clin Virol. 2005, 32: s59-66.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Schwartz SR, Yueh B, McDougall JK, Daling JR, Schwartz SM: Human papillomavirus infection and survival in oral squamous cell cancer: a population-based study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001, 125 (1): 1-9. 10.1067/mhn.2001.116979.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Badaracco G, Rizzo C, Mafera B, Pichi B, Giannarelli D, Rahimi SS, Vigili MG, Venuti A: Molecular analyses and prognostic relevance of HPV in head and neck tumours. Oncol Rep. 2007, 17 (4): 931-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mehta V, Yu GP, Schantz SP: Population-based analysis of oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma: Changing trends of histopathologic differentiation, survival and patient demographics. Laryngoscope. 2010, 120 (11): 2203-12. 10.1002/lary.21129.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cojocariu OM, Huguet F, Lefevre M, Périé S: Prognosis and predictive factors in head-and-neck cancers. Bull Cancer. 2009, 96 (4): 369-78.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sharma A, Méndez E, Yueh B, Lohavanichbutr P, Houck J, Doody DR, Futran ND, Upton MP, Schwartz SM, Chen C: Human papillomavirus-positive oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer patients do not have better quality-of-life trajectories. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012, 146 (5): 739-45. 10.1177/0194599811434707.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith EM, Rubenstein LM, Haugen TH, Pawlita M, Turek LP: Complex etiology underlies risk and survival in head and neck cancer human papillomavirus, tobacco, and alcohol: a case for multifactor disease. J Oncol. 2012, 2012: 571862-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Duray A, Descamps G, Decaestecker C, Remmelink M, Sirtaine N, Lechien J, Ernoux-Neufcoeur P, Bletard N, Somja J, Depuydt CE, Delvenne P, Saussez S: Human papillomavirus DNA strongly correlates with a poorer prognosis in oral cavity carcinoma. Laryngoscope. 2012, 122 (7): 1558-65. 10.1002/lary.23298.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang SF, Li HF, Liao CT, Wang HM, Chen IH, Chang JC, Chen YJ, Cheng AJ: Association of HPV infections with second primary tumors in early-staged oral cavity cancer. Oral Dis. 2012, 18 (8): 809-15. 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2012.01950.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Lee LA, Huang CG, Liao CT, Lee LY, Hsueh C, Chen TC, Lin CY, Fan KH, Wang HM, Huang SF, Chen IH, Kang CJ, Ng SH, Yang SL, Tsao KC, Chang YL, Yen TC: Human papillomavirus-16 infection in advanced oral cavity cancer patients is related to an increased risk of distant metastases and poor survival. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (7): e40767-10.1371/journal.pone.0040767.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Lohavanichbutr P, Houck J, Doody DR, Wang P, Mendez E, Futran N, Upton MP, Holsinger FC, Schwartz SM, Chen C: Gene Expression in Uninvolved Oral Mucosa of OSCC Patients Facilitates Identification of Markers Predictive of OSCC Outcomes. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (9): e46575-10.1371/journal.pone.0046575.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Mao EJ: Prevalence of human papillomavirus 16 and nucleolar organizer region counts in oral exfoliated cells from normal and malignant epithelia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1995, 80 (3): 320-9. 10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80390-7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Bouda M, Gorgoulis VG, Kastrinakis NG, Giannoudis A, Tsoli E, Danassi-Afentaki D, Foukas P, Kyroudi A, Laskaris G, Herrington CS, Kittas C: "High risk" HPV types are frequently detected in potentially malignant and malignant oral lesions, but not in normal oral mucosa. Mod Pathol. 2000, 13 (6): 644-53. 10.1038/modpathol.3880113.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. D'Souza G, Kreimer AR, Viscidi R, Pawlita M, Fakhry C, Koch WM, Westra WH, Gillison ML: Case-control study of human papillomavirus and oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007, 356 (19): 1944-56. 10.1056/NEJMoa065497.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao D, Xu QG, Chen XM, Fan MW: Human papillomavirus as an independent predictor in oral squamous cell cancer. Int J Oral Sci. 2009, 1 (3): 119-25. 10.4248/IJOS.09015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Andrews E, Seaman WT, Webster-Cyriaque J: Oropharyngeal carcinoma in non-smokers and non-drinkers: a role for HPV. Oral Oncol. 2009, 45 (6): 486-491. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.07.008. Epub 2008 Nov 21View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. do Sacramento PR, Babeto E, Colombo J, Cabral Ruback MJ, Bonilha JL, Fernandes AM, Pereira Sobrinho JS, de Souza FP, Villa LL, Rahal P: The prevalence of human papillomavirus in the oropharynx in healthy individuals in a Brazilian population. J Med Virol. 2006, 78 (5): 614-618. 10.1002/jmv.20583.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kreimer AR, Villa A, Nyitray A, Abrahamsen ME, Papenfuss MR, Smith D, Hildesheim A, Villa LL, Lazcano-Ponce E, Giuliano AR: The epidemiology of oral HPV infection among a multinational sample of healthy men. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011, 20 (1): 172-182. 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0682.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kreimer AR, Bhatia RK, Messeguer AL, González P, Herrero R, Giuliano AR: Oral human papillomavirus in healthy individuals: a systematic review of the literature. Sex Transm Dis. 2010, 37 (6): 386-91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner DO, Williams-Cocks SJ, Bullen R, Catmull J, Falk J, Martin D, Mauer J, Barber AE, Wang RC, Gerstenberger SL, Kingsley K: High-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) screening and detection in healthy patient saliva samples: a pilot study. BMC Oral Health. 2011, 11: 28-10.1186/1472-6831-11-28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Kingsley K, O’Malley S, Chino M: Analysis of oral cancer epidemiology in the US reveals state-specific trends: implications for oral cancer prevention. BMC Public Health. 2008, 8 (1): 87-10.1186/1471-2458-8-87.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Bunnell A, Pettit N, Reddout N, Sharma K, O’Malley S, Chino M, Kingsley K: Analysis of primary risk factors for oral cancer from select US states with increasing rates. Tob Induc Dis. 2010, 8: 5-10.1186/1617-9625-8-5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Swango PA: Cancers of the oral cavity and pharynx in the United States: an epidemiologic overview. J Public Health Dent. 1996, 56: 309-318. 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1996.tb02458.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Shiboski CH, Shiboski SC, Silverman S: Trends in oral cancer rates in the United States, 1973-1996. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2000, 28: 249-256. 10.1034/j.1600-0528.2000.280402.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Edwards BK, Howe HL, Ries LA, Thun MJ, Rosenberg HM, Yanick R, Wingo PA, Jemal A, Feigal EG: Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1973-1999, featuring implications of age and aging on U.S. cancer burden. Cancer. 2002, 94: 2766-2792. 10.1002/cncr.10593.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Gonçalves AK, Giraldo P, Barros-Mazon S, Gondo ML, Amaral RL, Jacyntho C: Secretory immunoglobulin A in saliva of women with oral and genital HPV infection. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006, 124 (2): 227-231. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.028. Epub 2005 Sep 6View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. SahebJamee M, Boorghani M, Ghaffari SR, AtarbashiMoghadam F, Keyhani A: Human papillomavirus in saliva of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009, 14 (10): e525-8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Seaman WT, Andrews E, Couch M, Kojic EM, Cu-Uvin S, Palefsky J, Deal AM, Webster-Cyriaque J: Detection and quantitation of HPV in genital and oral tissues and fluids by real time PCR. Virol J. 2010, 7: 194-10.1186/1743-422X-7-194.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhao M, Rosenbaum E, Carvalho AL, Koch W, Jiang W, Sidransky D, Califano J: Feasibility of quantitative PCR-based saliva rinse screening of HPV for head and neck cancer. Int J Cancer. 2005, 117 (4): 605-10. 10.1002/ijc.21216.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Trottier H, Burchell AN: Epidemiology of mucosal human papillomavirus infection and associated diseases. Public Health Genomics. 2009, 12 (5-6): 291-307. 10.1159/000214920. Epub 2009 Aug 11View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Chaudhary AK, Singh M, Sundaram S, Mehrotra R: Role of human papillomavirus and its detection in potentially malignant and malignant head and neck lesions: updated review. Head Neck Oncol. 2009, 1: 22-10.1186/1758-3284-1-22. ReviewView ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  54. Chow CW, Tabrizi SN, Tiedemann K, Waters KD: Squamous cell carcinomas in children and young adults: a new wave of a very rare tumor?. J Pediatr Surg. 2007, 42 (12): 2035-9. 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.08.025.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Schiødt M: Less common oral lesions associated with HIV infection: prevalence and classification. Oral Dis. 1997, 3 (Suppl 1): S208-213. ReviewView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Feller L, Khammissa RA, Wood NH, Malema V, Meyerov R, Lemmer J: Focal epithelial hyperplasia (Heck disease) related to highly active antiretroviral therapy in an HIV-seropositive child. A report of a case, and a review of the literature. SADJ. 2010, 65 (4): 172-175. ReviewPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Pinheiro RS, de França TR, Rocha B, Ferreira DC, Ribeiro CM, Cavalcanti SM, de Souza IP, Leão JC, Castro GF: Human papillomavirus coinfection in the oral cavity of HIV-infected children. J Clin Pathol. 2011, 64 (12): 1083-7. 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200187.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Rombaldi RL, Serafini EP, Mandelli J, Zimmermann E, Losquiavo KP: Perinatal transmission of human papilomavirus DNA. Virol J. 2009, 6: 83-10.1186/1743-422X-6-83.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Saini R, Khim TP, Rahman SA, Ismail M, Tang TH: High-risk human papillomavirus in the oral cavity of women with cervical cancer, and their children. Virol J. 2010, 7: 131-10.1186/1743-422X-7-131.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith EM, Parker MA, Rubenstein LM, Haugen TH, Hamsikova E, Turek LP: Evidence for vertical transmission of HPV from mothers to infants. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2010, 2010: 326369-View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Syrjänen S: Current concepts on human papillomavirus infections in children. APMIS. 2010, 118 (6-7): 494-509. 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2010.02620.x. ReviewView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Koskimaa HM, Waterboer T, Pawlita M, Grénman S, Syrjänen K, Syrjänen S: Human papillomavirus genotypes present in the oral mucosa of newborns and their concordance with maternal cervical human papillomavirus genotypes. J Pediatr. 2012, 160 (5): 837-43. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.10.027.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Martinelli M, Zappa A, Bianchi S, Frati E, Colzani D, Amendola A, Tanzi E: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and genotype frequency in the oral mucosa of newborns in Milan, Italy. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012, 18 (6): E197-9. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03839.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Marais DJ, Sampson C, Jeftha A, Dhaya D, Passmore JA, Denny L, Rybicki EP, Van Der Walt E, Stephen LX, Williamson AL: More men than women make mucosal IgA antibodies to Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV-16) and HPV-18: a study of oral HPV and oral HPV antibodies in a normal healthy population. BMC Infect Dis. 2006, 6: 95-10.1186/1471-2334-6-95.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  65. Summersgill KF, Smith EM, Levy BT, Allen JM, Haugen TH, Turek LP: Human papillomavirus in the oral cavities of children and adolescents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001, 91 (1): 62-9. 10.1067/moe.2001.108797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Rautava J, Syrjänen S: Human papillomavirus infections in the oral mucosa. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011, 142 (8): 905-14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Sinclair KA, Woods CR, Kirse DJ, Sinal SH: Anogenital and respiratory tract human papillomavirus infections among children: age, gender, and potential transmission through sexual abuse. Pediatrics. 2005, 116 (4): 815-25. 10.1542/peds.2005-0652.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Castellsagué X, Drudis T, Cañadas MP, Goncé A, Ros R, Pérez JM, Quintana MJ, Muñoz J, Albero G, de Sanjosé S, Bosch FX: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection in pregnant women and mother-to-child transmission of genital HPV genotypes: a prospective study in Spain. BMC Infect Dis. 2009, 9: 74-10.1186/1471-2334-9-74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith EM, Ritchie JM, Summersgill KF, Klussmann JP, Lee JH, Wang D, Haugen TH, Turek LP: Age, sexual behavior and human papillomavirus infection in oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Int J Cancer. 2004, 108 (5): 766-72. 10.1002/ijc.11633.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Tachezy R, Klozar J, Rubenstein L, Smith E, Saláková M, Smahelová J, Ludvíková V, Rotnáglová E, Kodet R, Hamsíková E: Demographic and risk factors in patients with head and neck tumors. J Med Virol. 2009, 81 (5): 878-87. 10.1002/jmv.21470.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. D'Souza G, Agrawal Y, Halpern J, Bodison S, Gillison ML: Oral sexual behaviors associated with prevalent oral human papillomavirus infection. J Infect Dis. 2009, 199 (9): 1263-9. 10.1086/597755.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Kim JJ, Goldie SJ: Health and economic implications of HPV vaccination in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2008, 359 (8): 821-32. 10.1056/NEJMsa0707052.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  73. Pinheiro Rdos S, de França TR, Ferreira Dde C, Ribeiro CM, Leão JC, Castro GF: Human papillomavirus in the oral cavity of children. J Oral Pathol Med. 2011, 40 (2): 121-126. 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2010.00954.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Mant C, Kell B, Rice P, Best JM, Bible JM, Cason J: Buccal exposure to human papillomavirus type 16 is a common yet transitory event of childhood. J Med Virol. 2003, 71: 593-598. 10.1002/jmv.10529.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Summersgill KF, Smith EM, Levy BT, Allen JM, Haugen TH, Turek LP: Human papillomavirus in the oral cavities of children and adolescents. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001, 91: 62-69. 10.1067/moe.2001.108797.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Naing L, Winn T, Rusli BN: Practical issues in calculating sample size for prevalence studies. Archives of Orofacial Sciences. 2006, 1: 9-14.Google Scholar
  77. Daniel WW: Biostatistics: A Foundation for Analysis in the Health Sciences. 2006, New York: John Wiley & Sons, 7Google Scholar
  78. Kingsley K, Johnson D, O’Malley S: Transfection of oral squamous cell carcinoma with human papillomavirus-16 induces proliferative and morphological changes independent of cellular adhesion in vitro. Cancer Cell Int. 2006, 6: 14-10.1186/1475-2867-6-14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  79. Reddout N, Christensen T, Bunnell A, Jensen D, Johnson D, O’Malley S, Kingsley K: High risk HPV types 18 and 16 are potent modulators of oral squamous cell carcinoma phenotypes in vitro. Infect. Agent Cancer. 2007, 2 (1): 21-10.1186/1750-9378-2-21.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Wolter F, Turchanowa L, Stein J: Resveratrol-induced modification of polyamine metabolism is accompanied by induction of c-Fos. Carcinogenesis. 2003, 24 (3): 469-74. 10.1093/carcin/24.3.469.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Chuang AY, Chuang TC, Chang S, Zhou S, Begum S, Westra WH, Ha PK, Koch WM, Califano JA: Presence of HPV DNA in convalescent salivary rinses is an adverse prognostic marker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2008, 44 (10): 915-919. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2008.01.001. Epub 2008 Mar 7View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  82. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:


© Flake et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.