Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Reliability and validity of self-assessment of mouth opening: a validation study

  • Daniel Satnam Singh Saund1,
  • David Pearson1 and
  • Thomas Dietrich2Email author
BMC Oral Health201212:48

DOI: 10.1186/1472-6831-12-48

Received: 27 July 2012

Accepted: 9 November 2012

Published: 12 November 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Jul 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Aug 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emi Inada
30 Sep 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Mitchell
8 Nov 2012 Author responded Author comments - Thomas Dietrich
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Nov 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Nov 2012 Editorially accepted
12 Nov 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6831-12-48

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Specialist Registrar Oral Surgeon, University of Birmingham, St Chads Queensway
(2)
The School of Dentistry, University of Birmingham, St Chad’s Queensway

Advertisement