Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical consequences of untreated dental caries assessed using PUFA index and its covariates in children residing in orphanages of Pakistan

  • Ramsha Kamran1Email author,
  • Warda Farooq1,
  • Mehreen Riaz Faisal2 and
  • Faisal Jahangir3
BMC Oral HealthBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:108

DOI: 10.1186/s12903-017-0399-9

Received: 17 August 2016

Accepted: 4 July 2017

Published: 11 July 2017

Abstract

Background

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and clinical effects of untreated dental caries in Pakistani children residing in orphanages using the DMFT and PUFA index; association of decay and untreated dental caries with demographics including type of orphanage; behavioural and dental visiting pattern; and association of dental pain experience and type of orphanage with dental visiting.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on a total of 753 orphan children belonging to 4-17 years of age group residing in twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. Clinical examination of children was performed using the DMFT and PUFA index for the assessment of dental caries and untreated decay, followed by questionnaire enquiring about eating and oral hygiene habits, dental visiting pattern and dental pain and swelling experience. Association between dental decay, child’s dental visiting and pain as a consequence of untreated decay was carried out using chi square test and logistic regression analysis.

Results

The overall caries prevalence was 34.8% and overall prevalence of PUFA/pufa was 15.9%. The mean score of DMFT and dmft was 1.18 (SD 0.39) and 1.04 (SD 0.23), and mean PUFA was 1.18 (SD 0.57) and mean pufa score 1.14 (SD 0.35). Untreated caries ratio was found to be 49.1% indicating half the decay had progressed to involve the pulp. No significant association of gender was found with DMFT, dmft, PUFA and pufa (p > 0.05), however, when analysed individually, the ‘D’ component of DMFT was significantly associated with male gender (p = 0.05). Furthermore, no significant association of DMFT/dmft or PUFA/pufa in either dentition was found with behavioural characteristics such as dietary and oral hygiene habits. Also, 66.2% children who experienced pain had not been to the dentist in the past year (p = 0.013) and 52.6% children who mentioned experiencing pain at night had not been to the dentist in the past year (p = 0.009). Children with decay were more likely to have visited the dentist (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.42-7.6, p = 0.006). However, children who reported to have experienced pain were less likely to have visited the dentist in the past year (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.88, p = 0.014).

Conclusions

Moderate levels of decay were found in the sample with ‘d’ component majorly responsible for the cumulative DMFT index. However, alarmingly almost half of the decay component (49.1%) had progressed to involve the pulp. Experiencing pain in teeth prompted dental visits. Initiation of preventive services for children residing in orphanages in Pakistan would help greatly towards reducing the burden of untreated decay.

Keywords

Untreated dental caries Orphanage children Pufa index Decayed extracted filled index

Background

Dental decay is a major frequent non-communicable form of disease that affects 60-90% children worldwide [1]. More recently, Marcenes et al. reported untreated decay of the permanent teeth as the most prevalent condition world over and untreated decay of deciduous dentition 10th most prevalent condition, in the Global Burden of Disease Study, 2010 [2]. Untreated dental caries can adversely affect children’s quality of life and result in severe consequences including risk of dental sepsis [3]. A significant association has also been reported between untreated decay and low body mass [4].

Orphans are particularly at risk of untreated decay due to lack of parental support and neglected oral health care [5]. UNICEF, UNAIDS & USAID reported that orphanages can be unfavourable for a child’s growth and development because for children to survive and thrive, they need to grow up in a community and family environment that caters to their changing needs. Development of children to their full potential is seriously hampered due to deterioration of family environment [6]. As a result a high prevalence of dental caries [7], dental trauma and gingivitis is seen in children from orphanages [8].

In Pakistan, dental caries have been reported to be the most prevalent childhood disease, 5 times more prevalent than Asthma and 7 times more common than Hayfever [9]. Caries prevalence of 71.7% has been reported in 6-14 year old children in Karachi [10]. Similar levels of decay have been seen in Peshawar (72.4%) in school going children of class one to six [11]. In Sargodha district of Pakistan, a study reported caries prevalence of 45.9% in 3-12 year old children [12], and In Rawalpindi and Islamabad, caries prevalence in 5 year old children has been reported to be 44.4% [13].

The caries prevalence in institutionalized children world over has been reported to be higher than those children who live with their families. Prevalence of decay in orphanage children in India has been reported to be 88.5% [14]. Similar decay levels have been reported in institutionalized 12-15 years old adolescents in Yemen (84.7%) [15] and 4-12 year old orphans in Saudi Arabia (96%) [16]. In China, 50% decay levels have been reported in 4-17 year old orphan children and adolescents [17].

Dental caries is a major community health problem and many studies exist which document the burden of untreated decay, yet data available on its clinical sequel is limited [1820]. DMFT/dmft index has been used worldwide to collect data on dental caries for so many decades, however, this cumulative index does not provide information on the clinical consequences of untreated dental caries, such as involvement of the pulp and development of abscess, which may be more jeopardous than the lesion itself, but rather provides information on its surgical and restorative treatment needs. To determine the severity and extensiveness of oral conditions that result due to untreated dental caries, index by the name of PUFA was presented by Monse et al. [21]. When used in conjunction with DMFT index, it helps in projecting the clinical consequences of untreated carious lesion [22]. The PUFA Index records the presence of grossly decayed teeth with, P/p: visible pulpal involvement, U/u: ulceration due to trauma from tooth fragments, F/f: fistula and A/a: abscess. Uppercase letters are for permanent and lowercase letters are for the deciduous teeth. Teeth that fulfil the PUFA diagnostic standard are scored and estimated cumulatively. Data collected through this index can have impact on decision taken by dental practitioners and decision makers, which cannot be obtained by DMFT index alone [23].

Not much work has been done in Pakistan to report the clinical consequences of untreated decay. As there is very limited data available about oral health status of socially deprived children residing in orphanages in Pakistan, the aim of our study is to report the clinical consequences of untreated decay in children living in orphanages of the twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, and the association of decay and untreated dental caries with demographics including type of orphanage, behavioural, and dental visiting pattern; and association of dental pain experience and type of orphanage with dental visiting.

Methods

A cross-sectional survey was conducted on a total of 753 orphan children aged 4-17 years residing in orphanages in twin cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad, Pakistan. The minimum required sample size calculated for this study was 384 with 95% confidence Interval and 5% margin of error.

Both the cities of Rawalpindi and Islamabad are major cities of Pakistan and are collectively known as the ‘Twin cities’ because they lie side by side, just a mere 15 km distance apart. The Rawalpindi-Islamabad Metropolitan area is the third largest in Pakistan with a population exceeding five million (Pakistan Bureau of statistics). The twin cities house a number of orphanages both private and government owned, however, no data on their oral health status is available.

The study adopted multistage random sampling technique in which from the list of orphanages of the twin cities, random selection was done on the basis of type of ownership of the orphanage (government or private) through a computer generated sequence. Hence, one government and one privately owned orphanage was randomly selected from each of the Twin cities. The inclusion criteria was children and adolescents aged 4-17 years of both genders who agreed to participate in the study. To avoid incorporation of bias, children with physical or mental disability, and any developmental dental anomaly were not included in the analysis because children with such conditions have difficulty in managing routine oral hygiene measures and hence are more prone to dental caries.

Ethical approval was obtained from Institute’s Research and Ethics committee. A meeting was then arranged with the primary care giver of the orphanages and after having explained to them the aims and objectives of the study, their written consent was obtained. The children were also informed about the study including the benefits and risks and were given the option to opt out if they were not willing to participate.

Data collection consisted of clinical examination and answering a questionnaire. Two trained dentists carried out the clinical examination of children according to the WHO methodology (1997), under the supervision of a senior dentist [24]. Since this study was part of a larger study, the examiners were trained and calibrated before the start of the whole project by a senior dentist with considerable experience in clinical dentistry. Reliability analysis were undertaken by examining 15 children not included in this study. The Intraclass correlation coefficient showed excellent agreement between both the examiners for dmft (0.93) as well as pufa (0.80).

Children were clinically examined in their respective orphanage, seated on a normal chair in daylight. The assessment was made visually without the use of any instrument except mouth mirror and gauze pads. Gauze pads were used only to remove food debris from the surface of the teeth. Barriers like gloves and masks were also used for personal protection. Prevalence of dental caries was scored by using DMFT/dmft index following the WHO criteria [24].

PUFA Index: This index was recorded separately from the DMFT index and was used to score the presence of PUFA according to the following codes and criteria as mentioned by the developers:

Only one score is assigned per tooth. When in doubt concerning the extent of odontogenic infection, the basic score (P/p for pulp involvement) is given. If the primary tooth and its permanent successor tooth are present and both show stages of odontogenic infections, both teeth will be scored. Upper case letters are used for the permanent dentition and lower case for the primary dentition. The PUFA score per person is calculated in the same cumulative way as for the dmft and represents the number of teeth that meet the PUFA diagnostic criteria. The PUFA for permanent teeth and primary teeth are reported separately. Thus, for an individual person the score ranges from 0 to 20 pufa for the primary dentition and from 0 to 32 PUFA for the permanent dentition.

A structured questionnaire was prepared to evaluate and record the oral hygiene practice, dietary habits and history of dental pain experience and dental visiting of the orphanage children (Additional file 1: Dental Questionnaire). The questionnaire comprised of 12 questions and was developed by the authors keeping in view the cultural context of the study. First two questions were about the individual’s oral hygiene practice such as tooth brushing frequency and the tooth cleaning method used. These two questions were adapted from the questionnaire used in study conducted by Shahbong et al. in orphanage children in India [14]. The next two questions enquired about the frequency of food/snacks taken per day and fizzy/carbonated drinks consumed during a week. Rest of the questions were related to frequency of dental visits, and problems with teeth and gums including episode and location of pain. Children were informed about how to fill the questionnaire and to ask for help if they faced any difficult in answering it. Children less than 10 years of age, were helped with filling the questionnaires by reading out the questions and explaining to them in local language to elicit their answer.

Data analysis was carried out using SPSS version 21. Caries prevalence and overall PUFA/pufa prevalence was calculated as percentage. Mean DMFT score for both primary and permanent dentition was reported. Untreated dental caries severity was recorded using PUFA index and reported as mean score. Untreated caries-pufa ratio calculated using [PUFA + pufa/D + d] × 100, provided information about percentage of teeth with untreated caries that developed odontogenic infection [21]. Chi square test was used to study association between categorical data such as age, gender, type or orphanage, dental visiting and pain, dmft/DMFT and pufa/PUFA. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to determine the effect of decay and pain on dental visiting.

Results

Total of 753 children were examined. Out of the total, majority were males (72.1%) and 27.9% were females. Children ages ranged from 4 to 17 years with mean age of 10.5 years. All the children present in the orphanage on the day examination agreed to take part in the study.

The mean score of dmft was 1.04 (SD 0.23) and DMFT was 1.18 (SD 0.39). A very small ‘f’ component was found in both the dentition. The mean pufa was 1.18 (0.57) and mean PUFA 1.14 (SD 0.35). No fistula and abscess were found for permanent dentition, however, abscess was reported with 2 teeth in primary dentition (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic details and DMFT/dmft and PUFA/pufa score of primary and permanent dentition of 753 children

Characteristic

N (%)

Gender

 Male

543 (72.1)

 Female

210 (27.9)

Age (years)

 4-5

25 (3.3)

 6-12

528 (70.1)

 13-17

200 (26.5)

Permanent dentition

Mean (SD)

 Decay (D)

0.83 (0.38)

 Missing (M)

0.16 (0.37)

 Filled (F)

0.006 (0.08)

 DMFT

1.18 (0.39)

 Pus (P)

0.86 (0.35)

 Ulceration (U)

0.86 (0.35)

 Fistula (F)

0

 Abscess (A)

0

 PUFA

1.14 (0.35)

Primary dentition

Mean (SD)

 Decay (d)

0.97 (0.17)

 Missing (m)

0.02 (0.15)

 Filled (f)

0.007 (0.09)

 dmft

1.04 (0.23)

 pus (p)

0.88 (0.33)

 ulcer (u)

0.09 (0.29)

 fistula (f)

0

 abscess (a)

0.09 (0.29)

 pufa

1.18 (0.57)

No association of dmft (p = 0.29) and DMFT was found with gender (p = 0.14). However, when analysed individually, the ‘D’ component of DMFT was significantly associated with male gender (p = 0.05). No association of both pufa (p = 0.25) and PUFA (p = 0.29) was found with gender of the child (Table 2).
Table 2

Percentage prevalence of DMFT, dmft and PUFA, pufa according to child gender and age groups

Characteristics

Gender n (%)

Age groups (years)

Male

Female

4-5

6-12

13-17

dmft

90 (71.3)

38 (28.7)

05 (3.9)

116 (91.3)

06 (4.7)

p value

0.29

0.91

0.003a

<0.001a

DMFT

114 (69.9)

49 (30)

-

124 (75.1)

41 (24.8)

p value

0.14

0.65

0.02a

pufa

48 (72.7)

18 (27.2)

03 (4.5)

63 (95.4)

-

p value

0.25

0.86

0.11

PUFA

48 (75)

16 (25)

-

50 (78.1)

14 (21.8)

p value

0.29

0.22

0.79

astatistically significant at 0.05 level

No PUFA value was reported for 4-5 years age group. Also, PUFA did not show significant association with children’s age groups of 6-12 years-old (p = 0.22) and 13-17 years-old (p = 0.79). Similarly, pufa values recorded in 4-5 years old (p = 0.86) and 6-12 years-old age (p = 0.11) were not significantly associated (Table 2). Although dmft did not show significant association with 4-5 years-old age group, it was found to be significantly associated with 6-12 years-old (p = 0.003) and 13-17 years-old age group (p < 0.001). The DMFT was also significantly associated with 13-17 years-old age group (p = 0.02). DMFT did not show any significant association with tooth brushing frequency (p = 0.55), tooth cleaning method used (p = 0.45), frequency of meals/snacks intake (p = 0.96) and fizzy/carbonated drinks consumption (p = 0.82). Similarly, dmft did not show significant association with tooth brushing frequency (p = 0.94), tooth cleaning method used (p = 1.0), frequency of meals/snacks intake (p = 0.90) and fizzy/carbonated drinks consumption (p = 0.32). No significant association was found between PUFA and tooth brushing frequency (p = 0.22), tooth cleaning method used (p = 0.68), frequency of meals/snacks intake (p = 0.52) and fizzy/carbonated drinks consumption (p = 0.54). Also, no significant association was seen for pufa and tooth brushing frequency (p = 0.95), tooth cleaning method used (p = 0.054), frequency of meals/snacks intake (p = 0.07) and fizzy/carbonated drinks consumption (p = 0.71).

Low overall caries prevalence was seen according to index ages of 5 years (2.3%), 12 years (13%) and 15 year-olds (3.8%). The 12 year-olds showed the highest overall pufa prevalence of 12.6% as compared to 5 year olds (1.7%) and 15 year-olds (1.7%) (Table 3).
Table 3

Prevalence of DMFT, dmft, PUFA, pufa, overall caries prevalence and overall PUFA/pufa prevalence according to WHO index ages of 5, 12 and 15 year-old children

Prevalence

5 years olds

12 year olds

15 year olds

Dmft

3.9%

11.8%

0.8%

DMFT

-

14.5%

6.1%

Overall caries prevalence

2.3%

13%

3.8%

pufa

3.1

12.3%

-

PUFA

-

15.6%

1.6%

Overall pufa prevalence

1.7%

12.6%

1.7%

The overall caries prevalence is 34.8% and overall PUFA/pufa prevalence is 15.9%. Highly significant association was found between DMFT and PUFA (p < 0.001) and between the orphanage and DMFT (p < 0.001) and PUFA (p = 0.02) (Table 4).
Table 4

Association of type of orphanage and dental visiting with DMFT/dmft and PUFA/pufa

Characteristics

DMFT n (%)

(p value)

dmft n (%)

(p value)

PUFA n (%)

(p value)

pufa n (%)

(p value)

Type of Orphanage

 Government owned

86 (52.1)

48 (37.5)

30 (46.9)

23 (34.8)

 Private owned

79 (47.9)

80 (62.5)

34 (53.1)

43 (65.1)

p < 0.001*

p = 0.43

p = 0.02*

p = 0.19

Dental visiting in past year

 Yes

46 (27.9)

32 (25)

20 (31.25)

19 (28.8)

 No

119 (72.1)

96 (75)

44 (68.75)

47 (71.2)

p = 0.009*

p = 0.21

p = 0.53

p = 0.50

*significant at 0.05 level

Dental visiting was found to be low, 28.8% for government owned and 16.6% for privately owned orphanage. More than half the children who experienced pain had not been to the dentist in the past year (66.2%) p = 0.013. Similarly 52.6% children who mentioned experiencing pain at night had not been to the dentist in the past year (p = 0.009) (Table 5).
Table 5

Association of type of orphanage and pain characteristics with dental visiting in past year

Characteristic

Dental visiting in past year

Yes

No

p value

Type of Orphanage

 Government owned

106 (28.8)

262 (71.2)

 

 Private owned

64 (16.6)

321 (83.4)

<0.001*

Do you feel any pain in your teeth

 Yes

26 (33.8)

51 (66.2)

 

 No

144 (21.3)

532 (78.7)

0.013*

Do you ever have pain at night

 Yes

9 (47.4)

10 (52.6)

 

 No

161 (21.9)

573 (78.1)

0.009*

*Significant at 0.05 level

When viewed individually, the ‘D’ component of DMFT was majorly responsible for the score of the cumulative index (p > 0.001) for both the orphanage type.

The results of the logistic regression analysis (Table 6) reveal that children with decay (D) were more likely to have visited the dentist (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.42-7.6, p = 0.006). Also, children who had experienced pain were less likely to have visited the dentist in the past year (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.88, p = 0.014).
Table 6

Logistic regression analysis of Decay (D) and Pain with dental visiting

Characteristic

Dental visiting n (%)

Odds ratio

Confidence Interval

Significance level

Decay (D)

 Absent

14 (50)

   

 Present

32 (23.4)

3.3

1.4-7.6

0.006a

Pain

 Absent

144 (21.3)

   

 Present

26 (33.8)

0.53

0.32-0.88

0.014a

aSignificant at 0.05 level

Discussion

This study was carried out to assess the prevalence of consequences of untreated dental decay in children residing in orphanages of the twin cities, Rawalpindi and Islamabad. This is the first study that has been undertaken in Pakistan which looked in to the clinical consequences of untreated dental decay in socially deprived children. As compared to various studies conducted in different parts of the world, low overall caries prevalence (34.8%) and low overall PUFA/pufa prevalence (15.9%) were found in our sample. Gu et al. reported 50% caries prevalence in 4-17 year old institutionalised children in China [17]. Al-Jobair et al. reported 96% caries prevalence in 4-12 year old children resident in orphanages in Saudi Arabia [16]. When DMFT/dmft and PUFA/pufa prevalence were analysed according to age groups, 24.8% DMFT prevalence and 21.8% PUFA prevalence was seen in 13-17 year-old children in our sample. Shahbong et al. reported 88.5% caries prevalence and 37.7% PUFA prevalence in 12-14 year old orphanage children in India [14]. Mehta et al. found 69.5% dmft and 38.6% pufa prevalence in 5-6 years old Indian children [23], whereas in our sample 3.9% dmft prevalence and 4.5% pufa prevalence was seen in 4-5 year-old children. On the other hand, higher dmft prevalence (91.3%) and pufa prevalence (95.4%) was seen in 6-12 year-old children in our study as compared to study reports by Thekiso et al. of 46% dmft and 41% pufa prevalence in 6-8 year-old children in South Africa [25]. Moderate level of decay was found in our sample with caries prevalence of 34.8%, however, the untreated caries ratio turned out to be 49%. This implies that almost half of the decayed teeth have progressed to pulpal involvement and abscess formation. Grund et al. report similar results of 40% caries progression into the pulp in 5 and 8 year old German children [22].

When further analysed on the basis of government or private ownership of the orphanage, it was seen that the government owned orphanage showed higher decay levels in the permanent dentition as compared to the private owned. On the other hand, PUFA score was found to be more in the private owned orphanage. Dental visiting and DMFT were found to be significantly associated, 66.2% children who felt pain in their teeth and 52.6% who felt pain at night had not been to the dentist in the past year. These results are similar to the results of study conducted in Nepal by Parai Dixit et al. which reports 93% 5-6 and 12-13 year-old children had never been to the dentist and 31% of 8-16 year-old reported having had suffered from oral pain [26]. The decay component being the major contributor of both DMFT and dmft also indicates that the dental visiting/examination pattern is problem based and not done on regular basis.

It was also seen that the ‘d’ component of dmft of primary dentition was seen most in the 10 year old age group (21.7%), when compared for all the ages (p < 0.001). This means that primary dentition is considered as temporary and hence not given much attention even when there is definitive need for treatment.

The symptom based dental visiting pattern is a common trend in many parts of the world and has been reported by many studies. In this regard, the pattern seen in these orphanages is no different than in children living with their families. Geottems el at reported presence of pain and not just decay was the reason for dental service utilisation by parents for their children in Brazil [27]. Another study reported symptom based dental service utilisation by both children and adolescents in Mexico [28].

Both the type of orphanages have their own faculty to provide for the educational needs of the children. How often or how much health education is imparted to the children is a concern seeing the presence of untreated decay in children. Another factor that can be responsible for the presence of decay in children is free access to sugary foods and sweetened drinks and most of the times, as a sympathetic gesture, people hand out sweets to these children which further escalates the problem.

The children had come to the orphanages at different ages and some even visit their relatives in vacations, this can also be attributed for presence of untreated decay as when children are away from the orphanage, their dietary and oral hygiene practices may differ [14].

The large sample size taken in this study provided us with an opportunity to sample children with primary and permanent dentition, hence, study decay and untreated decay levels in both the dentition. A limitation of our study is not being able to take into consideration the time period a child has spent in the orphanage or spends outside it, as this could have accounted for the influence of external environment.

Conclusions

PUFA index can be used as an effective tool for evaluation of clinical consequences of untreated decay. When used in conjunction with DMFT index, it can provide valuable data for planning of preventive services and provision of treatment to those with urgent treatment needs. Initiation of oral health promotion programmes to train the faculty, staff and children residing in the orphanages, in oral hygiene maintenance would greatly help towards reducing the burden of oral diseases for the under privileged children.

Abbreviations

DMFT: 

Decayed, missing, filled teeth (permanent dentition)

dmft: 

decayed, missing, filled teeth (primary dentition)

PUFA: 

pulpal involvement, ulceration, fistula, abscess (permanent dentition)

pufa: 

pulpal involvement, ulceration, fistula, abscess (primary dentition)

UNAIDS: 

Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS

UNICEF: 

United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund

USAID: 

United States Agency for International Development

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the participants including the faculty and staff of the orphanages for taking part in our study. We also wish to thank Dr. Usman-ul-Haq for his general contribution.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this study.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during this study are not publically available in order to keep them in strict confidence, but can be obtained from corresponding author on reasonable request.

Authors’ contributions

MRF conceptualized the study. RK, WF and MRF developed the study design, RK and WF were responsible for literature review, data collection including collation of questionnaires and clinical examinations. FJ and MRF were responsible for part data analysis and authoring major part of manuscript and producing the final product of submission. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Margalla Institute of Health Sciences Review and Ethics Committee. Written informed Consent for participation was obtained from caretakers of the orphanage and children were given the option to opt out if they did not wish to participate.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors declare they have no financial or non-financial competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Margalla Institute of Health Sciences
(2)
Department of Community & Preventive Dentistry, Margalla Institute of Health Sciences
(3)
Department of Oral Medicine, Margalla Institute of Health Sciences

References

  1. Petersen PE, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83:661–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Marcenes W, Kassebaum NJ, Bernabe E, Flaxman A, Naghavi M, Lopez A, Murray CJ. Global burden of oral conditions in 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. J Dent Res. 2013;92:592–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Pine C, Harris VR, Burnside G, Merrett MCE. An investigation of the relationship between untreated decayed teeth and sepsis in 5- year-old children. British Dent J. 2006;200:45–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Benzian H, Monse B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Hobdell M, Mulder J, van Palenstein Heldermen W. Untreated severe dental decay: a neglected determinant of low body mass index in 12-year-old Filipino children. BMC Public Health. 2011;13:11–558.Google Scholar
  5. Camacho GA, Camacho E, Rodríguez RA, Guillé A, Juárez HM, Pérez GM. Predisposing factors for dental caries in girls at an orphanage of Mexico City. Acta Pediatr Mex. 2009;30(2):71–6.Google Scholar
  6. UNAIDS, UNICEF, USAID. Children on the brink 2004: a joint report of new orphan estimates and a framework for action 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Dixit S, Chaudhary M, Singh A. Molluscum contagiosum and dental caries: A pertinent combination. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2009;27(4):197–201.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sullivan EA, Stephens AJ. The oral and dental status of children residing in a Romanian orphanage. Int J Paediatr Dent. 1997;7(1):41–2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Bille K, Aslam M. Oral health in Pakistan a situation analysis. Islamabad: Government of Pakistan-Ministry of Health D WHO-Pakistan; 2003.Google Scholar
  10. Ali A, Asghar S, Somoro S. Caries prevalence among school children age 6-14 years in Gadap town Karachi in relation to the awareness of their parents toward oral health. Pak Oral Dent J. 2013;33(2):354–8.Google Scholar
  11. Umer A, Umer A. Prevalence of dental caries among the primary school children of urban Peshawar. J Khyber Coll Dent. 2011;2(1):1–6.Google Scholar
  12. Umer MF, Farooq U, Shabbir A, Zofeen S, Mujtaba H, Tahir M. Prevalence and associated factors of dental caries, gingivitis, and calculus deposits in school children of Sargodha District. Pakistan J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2016;28(1):152–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Rizwan M, Rizwan S. Prevalence and pattern of dental caries in the deciduous dentition. Oral Dent J. 2009;29(1):141–4.Google Scholar
  14. Shanbhog R, Godhi BS, Nandlal B, Kumar SS, Raju V, Rashmi S. Clinical consequences of untreated dental caries evaluated using PUFA index in orphanage children from India. J Int Oral Health. 2013;5(5):1–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Al Maweri SA, Al Soneidar WA, Halboub E. Oral lesions and dental status among institutionalized orphans in Yemen: a matched case-control study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2014;5(1):81–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Al-Jobair AM, Al-Sadhan SA, Al-Faifi AA, Andijani RI, Al-Motlag SK. Medical and dental health status of orphan children in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2013;34(5):531–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Gu S, Lin J, Wang M, Qian W, Wu Y, Zhu X, Wu Y. Oral health status of 4-17 year old orphan children and adolescents of Chongqing. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014;32(4):378–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Reisine ST. The impact of dental conditions on social functioning and quality of life. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;9:1–19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Low W, Tan S, Schwartz S. The effect of severe caries on the quality of life in young children. Pediatr Dent. 1999;21(6):325–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Filstrup SL, Briskie D, Da Fonseca M, Lawrence L, Wandera A, Inglehart MR. Early childhood caries and quality of life: child and parent perspectives. Pediatr Dent. 2003;25(5):431–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Monse B, Heinrich-Weltzien R, Benzian H, Holmgren C. PUFA – an index of clinical consequences of untreated dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2010;38(1):77–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Grund K, Goddon I, Schuler IM, Lehmann T, Heinrich-Weltzien R. Clinical consequences of untreated dental caries in German 5- and 8-year-olds. BMC Oral Health. 2015;15(1):140.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Mehta A, Bhalla S. Assessing consequences of untreated carious lesions using pufa index among 5–6 years old school children in an urban Indianpopulation. Indian J Dent Res. 2014;25(2):150–3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. World Health Organization. Oral health surveys-basic methods. 4th ed. Geneva: WHO; 1997.Google Scholar
  25. Thekiso M, Yengopal V, Rudolph MJ, Bhayat A. Caries status among children in the west Rand District of Gauteng Province, South Africa. SADJ. 2012;67(7):318–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Dixit PL, Shakya A, Shrestha M, Shrestha A. Dental caries prevalence, oral health knowledge and practice among indigenous Chepang school children of Nepal. BMC oral Health. 2013;13:20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Goettems ML, Ardenghi TM, Demarco FF, Romano AR, Torriani DD. Children's use of dental services: influence of maternal dental anxiety, attendance pattern, and perception of children's quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012;40:451–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Villalobos-Rodelo JJ, Medina-Solís CE, Molina-Frechero N, Vallejos-Sánchez AA, Pontigo-Loyola AP, Espinoza-Beltrán JL. Dental caries in school children aged 6-12 in years in Navolato, Mexico: experience, prevalence, severity and treatment needs. Biomedica. 2006;26:224–33. (In Spanish)View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2017

Advertisement