Skip to main content

Table 5 Patient questionnaire data: importance of scale and polish at follow-up

From: Patient perceptions regarding benefits of single visit scale and polish: a randomised controlled trial

 

Patient-reported score

6-month group

12-month group

24-month group

Kruskal-Wallis test

     

P-value

How important do you think a regular scale and polish is to keep your mouth clean?

Follow-up

1 (No Importance)

10 (9.7)

5 (5.2)

5 (5.1)

0.502

(N = 298)

2

10 (9.7)

13 (13.5)

7 (7.1)

 

3

27 (26.2)

21 (21.9)

30 (30.3)

N (%)

4

12 (11.7)

12 (12.5)

20 (20.2)

 

5 (Extremely important)

44 (42.7)

45 (46.9)

37 (37.4)

Complete dataset analysis (N = 298)

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.28

0.97

-

(0.74, 2.19)

(0.58, 1.63)

Multiple imputation (N = 363)

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.29

0.96

-

(0.75, 2.20)

(0.57, 1.60)

Follow-up (N = 302) N (%)

1 (No Importance)

3 (2.9)

2 (2.0)

0 (0)

0.234

2

2 (1.9)

2 (2.0)

3 (3.0)

3

9 (8.6)

7 (7.1)

17 (17.2)

How important do you think a regular scale and polish is to keep your gums healthy?

N (%)

4

20 (19.0)

14 (14.3)

16 (16.2)

 

5 (Extremely important)

71 (67.6)

73 (74.5)

63 (63.6)

Complete dataset analysis

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.25

0.79

-

Complete dataset analysis (N = 302)

OR (95% CI)f

(0.65, 2.40)

(0.43, 1.45)

Multiple imputation

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.28

0.81

-

(0.68, 2.42)

(0.44, 1.47)

(N = 367)

 

How important do you think a regular scale and polish is to prevent bad breath?

Follow-up

1 (No Importance)

14 (13.3)

7 (7.3)

8 (8.1)

0.477

(N = 300)

2

12 (11.4)

10 (10.4)

10 (10.1)

 

3

27 (25.7)

21 (21.9)

27 (27.3)

N (%)

4

10 (9.5)

17 (17.7)

15 (15.2)

 

5 (Extremely important)

42 (40.0)

41 (42.7)

39 (39.4)

Complete dataset analysis (N = 300)

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.64

1.20

-

(0.97, 2.78)

(0.71, 2.01)

Multiple imputation

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.67

1.20

-

(0.99, 2.83)

(0.99, 2.83)

(N = 367)

     

How important do you think a regular scale and polish is to make your teeth whiter?

Follow-up

1 (No Importance)

18 (17.3)

15 (15.8)

10 (10.2)

0.490

(N = 297)

2

15 (14.4)

12 (12.6)

8 (8.2)

 

3

24 (23.1)

25 (26.3)

35 (35.7)

N (%)

4

23 (22.1)

20 (21.1)

19 (19.4)

 

5 (Extremely important)

24 (23.1)

23 (24.2)

26 (26.5)

Complete dataset analysis (N = 297)

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.13

1.25

-

(0.68, 1.87)

(0.76, 2.07)

Multiple imputation (N = 366)

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.14

1.26

-

(0.70, 1.86)

(0.76, 2.09)

How important do you think a regular scale and polish is to prevent tooth decay

Follow-up (N = 299)

1 (No Importance)

4 (3.9)

1 (1.0)

1 (1.0)

0.298

2

5 (4.9)

4 (4.1)

5 (5.1)

 

3

8 (7.8)

9 (9.2)

12 (12.2)

N (%)

4

18 (17.5)

13 (13.3)

20 (20.4)

 

5 (Extremely important)

68 (66.0)

71 (72.4)

60 (61.2)

Complete dataset analysis (N = 299)

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.71

1.03

-

(0.89, 3.26)

(0.57, 1.86)

Multiple imputation (N = 364)

OR (95% CI)f

1.00

1.79

1.07

-

(0.94, 3.44)

(0.60, 1.90)

  1. fProportional Odds Ratio from Ordered Logistic regression for follow up adjusted for baseline values of each outcome.