Skip to main content

Table 3 Cross-sectional validity of generic OIDP: association of generic OIDP with age, sex and perceived oral health status

From: Discriminative ability of the generic and condition specific Oral Impact on Daily Performance (OIDP) among adolescents with and without hypodontia

Variables

Mean OIDP (SD)

Effect size

OIDP > 0, % (n)

Unadjusted OR (95% CI)

Adjusted OR (95% CI)

Age

     

10–12 years

2.6 (4.2)

 

56.8 (42)

1

 

13–17 years

3.8 (5.2)

0.2

68.5 (61)

1.7 (0.9 – 3.2)

 

Sex

     

Female

3.1 (4.6)

 

62.7 (52)

1

 

Male

3.5 (5.0)

0.1

63.7 (51)

1.0 (0.6 – 2.0)

 

Perceived oral health status

     

Good

2.8 (4.3)

 

58.5 (69)

1

1

Bad

4.8 (6.0)**

0.4

78.6 (33)*

2.6 (1.1 – 5.9)

2.5 (1.1 – 5.8)a

Satisfaction with dental

     

appearance

     

Satisfied

1.7 (3.3)

 

48.0 (24)

1

1

Unsatisfied

4.1 (5.3)**

0.5

70.0 (77)**

2.5 (1.3 – 5.0)

2.5 (1.2 – 4.9)a

Oral health compared to others

     

Better

2.0 (2.9)

 

55.3 (21)

1

1

Same or worse

3.7 (5.3)

0.4

66.4 (81)

1.6 (0.8 – 3.4)

1.6 (0.7 – 3.4)a

  1. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
  2. aAdjusted OR for sex and age.