Skip to main content

Table 2 Fit indices for confirmatory factor analyses ( N = 351; n males = 176; n females = 175)

From: The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity

Model χ2(d.f) CFI TLI RMSEA (90% CI) SRMR χ2difference test
Full sample       
 1 Hypothesized measurement model 340.67*(32) .84 .77 .17 (.15, .18) .10  
 1a Modified measurement model 153.62*(30) .93 .90 .11 (.09, .13) .06
Gender multi-group analysis       
 2 Full model 196.31* (67) .93 .91 .11 (.09, .12) .07 ∆ χ2 = 11.18, d.f. = 10, p = .34
 2a Nested model 207.49* (77) .93 .92 .10 (.08, .12) .07  
  1. Note. CFI: comparative fit index; TLI: Tucker-Lewis index RMSEA: root mean-square error of approximation; and SRMR: root mean square residual.
  2. *p < .05.