Table 2 Fit indices for confirmatory factor analyses ( N = 351; n males = 176; n females = 175)
From: The reasons for betel-quid chewing scale: assessment of factor structure, reliability, and validity
Model | χ2(d.f) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA (90% CI) | SRMR | χ2difference test |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Full sample | ||||||
1 Hypothesized measurement model | 340.67*(32) | .84 | .77 | .17 (.15, .18) | .10 | |
1a Modified measurement model | 153.62*(30) | .93 | .90 | .11 (.09, .13) | .06 | |
Gender multi-group analysis | ||||||
2 Full model | 196.31* (67) | .93 | .91 | .11 (.09, .12) | .07 | ∆ χ2 = 11.18, d.f. = 10, p = .34 |
2a Nested model | 207.49* (77) | .93 | .92 | .10 (.08, .12) | .07 |