Skip to main content

Table 1 Means (SD) for single items with significant group (G), time (T) (2002 – 2004) or interaction effect (I).

From: Parental beliefs and attitudes towards child caries prevention: assessing consistency and validity in a longitudinal design

Item

 

WN-group

IM-group

 
  

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

F-value

C18 As a family, we intend controlling how often our child has sugary foods or drinks between meals

(1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree)

2002

2004

4.19 (0.81)

4.30 (0.70)

3.88 (0.74)

4.00 (0.72)

G: 5.36*

T: 1.78

I: 0.00

C23 It is worthwhile to give our child sweets/biscuits to behave well

(1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree)

2002

2004

4.44 (0.79)

4.54 (0.80)

3.67 (1.01)

3.67 (1.17)

G: 38.49***

T: 0.23

I: 0.23

C25 The people we know well would feel it was important to control how often our child has sugary foods and drinks

(1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree)

2002

2004

2.62 (1.16)

2.90 (1.19)

3.46 (1.14)

3.71 (0.96)

G: 15.98***

T: 3.55

I: 0.01

C26 In our family, it would be unfair not to give sweets to our child every day

(1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree)

2002

2004

4.44 (1.05)

4.59 (0.83)

3.50 (1.35)

3.50 (1.35)

G: 36.80***

T: 0.33

I: 0.33

C27 It is often too stressful to say no to my child when they want sweets

(1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree)

2002

2004

4.10 (0.97)

4.35 (0.82)

3.25 (1.03)

3.29 (1.30)

G: 33.25 ***

T: 1.98

I: 0.96

C30 It is not worth it to battle with our child to brush his/her teeth twice a day

(1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree)

2002

2004

4.39 (0.86)

4.58 (0.76)

3.67 (1.13)

3.58 (1.41)

G: 35.12***

T: 0.21

I: 1.50

C32 The dentist is the best person to prevent tooth decay in our child

(1 = strongly agree, 5 = strongly disagree)

2002

2004

4.00 (0.82)

4.22 (0.80)

3.29 (1.00)

3.54 (1.18)

G: 24.05***

T: 4.86*

I: 0.01

  1. * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001.