Skip to main content

Table 1 Details of European studies considered.

From: Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and non-neoplastic oral diseases in Europe and the United States

First author, year of publication

Location

Study Perioda

Sex

Age

Population

Further details of study design

Endpointsb

Experimental studies

Larsson 1991 [1]

Sweden (Malmö)

3 to 6 months

M

21 to 70 Mean 36

29 snuff users with degree 2 to 4 mucosal lesions selected from Andersson 1989 [18]

Subjects advised to stop or change their habit

ML

Andersson 1995 [2]

Sweden (Malmö)

12 weeks

Not given

Mean 37

24 users of snuff brand A, 18 users of low-nicotine snuff brand B

Subjects observed for 2 weeks, then brand A users switched to brand B for 10 weeksc

ML

Andersson 2003 [3]

Sweden (Malmö)

24 weeks

Not given

Mean 34

20 users of snuff brand A with degree 3 or 4 lesions

Subjects switched to brand B with lower pH for 12 weeks, then to brand C with same pH as brand B but lower nicotined

ML

Prospective studies

Roosaar 2006 [4]

Sweden (Uppsala county)

1973–1974 to 2002

M

15+

1115 men with "snus-induced lesions" in 1973–1974 followed up

Selected from 7890 men examined

ML

Case-control studies

Rosenquist 2005 [5]

Sweden (South)

2001 to 2004

M+F

33 to 87

132 cases of oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, 320 population controls

Cases and controls matched on age ± 3 years, sex and county

ML

Cross-sectional studies of populations unselected by ST use

Tyldesley 1971 [50]

England (Lancashire)

Not given

M

Not given

402 coal miners

-

ML

Modéer 1980 [6]

Sweden (Stockholm)

Not given

M+F

13 to 14 Mean 13.5

232 school children

-

PD

Jungell 1985 [7]

Finland (Tammisaari)

Not given

M

17 to 29

441 military recruits

-

ML

Salonen 1990 [8]

Sweden (Älvsborg county)

1983 To 1984

Me

20+

477 randomly selected male adults

-

ML

Hirsch 1991 [9]

Sweden (Gothenburg)

Not given

M+F

14 to 19 Mean 16.8

2145 teenagers attending for dental check-up

-

DC

Wickholm 2004 [10]

Sweden (National)

1985

M+F

31 to 40

1674 adults born on 20th of month

-

PD

Bergström 2006 [11]

Sweden (National)

2002 to 2003

M

26 to 54

84 submariners

-

PD, DC

Montén 2006 [12]

Sweden (Göteborg)

Not given

M

19

103 never smokers

Subsample from larger epidemiological study

PD

Cross-sectional studies of populations selected by ST use and/or presence of oral lesions

Pindborg 1963 [13]

Denmark (Copenhagen)

Not given

M

39 to 83

12 long-term snuff users

SIL probable inclusion criterion

ML

Roed-Petersen 1973 [14]

Denmark (Copenhagen)

1956 to 1970

M+F

< 20 to 90+ Mean 55

450 oral leukoplakia patients

-

ML, OP

Axéll 1976 [15]

Sweden (Not given)

Not given

M

20 to 88 Mean 50

114 snuff users with oral lesions

-

ML

Hirsch 1982 [16]

Sweden (Gothenburg)

Not given

M

15 to 84 Mean 41

50 habitual snuff users

SIL probable inclusion criterion

ML

Frithiof 1983 [17]

Sweden (Stockholm)

Not given

M

31 to 79 Mean 55

21 long-term snuff users referred to dental school for oral lesions

-

ML, PD

Andersson 1989 [18]

Sweden (Malmö)

1986 to 1987

M

17 to 80 Mean 36

252 snuff users; construction and shipyard workers and outpatients

-

ML, PD

Andersson 1994 [19]

Sweden (Malmö)

Not given

M

21 to 75 Mean 42

45 habitual snuff users and 9 users of CT selected from Andersson 1989 [18]

Loose and portion-bag users matched on consumption and usage

ML

Rolandsson 2005 [20]

Sweden (Värmland)

Not given

M

16 to 25 Mean 21

80 ice hockey players, of which 40 were snuff users and 40 non users

Snuff users and non users age matched

ML, PD, DC

  1. a Length of follow-up period for experimental studies, period of follow-up for prospective studies, and time study conducted otherwise
  2. b DC = dental caries, ML = mucosal lesion, OP = oral pain, PD = periodontal or gingival diseases
  3. c Brand A 0.8–0.9% nicotine, 8.2–8.5 pH; Brand B 0.4–0.5% nicotine, 7.8–8.2 pH
  4. d Brand A 0.8% nicotine, 8.6 pH; Brand B 0.8% nicotine, 8.0 pH; Brand C 0.4–0.5% nicotine, 8.0 pH
  5. e Women were also studied but none used snuff