Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Utilization of the ART approach in a group of public oral health operators in South Africa: a 5-year longitudinal study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
30 Oct 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Kilpatrick
24 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Yip
30 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Maria Fidela Navarro
12 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Steffen Mickenautsch
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Nicky Kilpatrick
24 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Steffen Mickenautsch
Resubmission - Version 3
24 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Steffen Mickenautsch
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
15 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Steffen Mickenautsch
Resubmission - Version 6
15 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
21 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
21 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6831-9-10

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement