Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of participants

From: Views of Australian dental practitioners towards rural recruitment and retention: a descriptive study

 

Dentist

(N = 34)

Prosthetist

(N = 8)

OHT

(N = 8)

Total

(N = 50)

Percentage

%

Location of practice

RA1-Major cities

   

(18/50)

48 %

 RA1 male

9

3

0

12

 

 RA1 female

6

0

0

6

 

RA2-Inner regional

   

(21/50)

42 %

 RA2 male

10

1

1

12

 

 RA2 female

5

1

3

9

 

RA3-Outer regional

   

(3/50)

6 %

 RA3 male

0

1

0

1

 

 RA3 female

1

1

0

2

 

RA4-Remote

   

(1/50)

2 %

 RA4 male

0

1

0

1

 

 RA4 female

0

0

0

0

 

RA5-Very remote

   

(4/50)

8 %

 RA5 male

2

0

0

2

 

 RA5 female

0

0

2

2

 

Unemployed

   

(3/50)

6 %

 Unemployed male

0

0

0

0

 

 Unemployed female

1

0

2

3

 

Classification of practice

 Urban

30

5

4

(39/50)

78 %

 Rural

3

3

2

(8/50)

16 %

 Unemployed

1

0

2

(3/50)

6 %

Prior rural exposure

 Yes

25

6

6

(37/50)

74 %

 No

9

2

2

(13/50)

26 %

Age groups

 20–34

10

0

2

(12/50)

24 %

 35–44

6

0

2

(8/50)

16 %

 45–54

4

4

2

(10/50)

20 %

 55–64

10

4

2

(16/50)

32 %

 65+

4

0

0

(4/50)

8 %

Birthplace

 Africa

1

0

0

(1/50)

2 %

 Asia

5

0

1

(6/50)

12 %

 Australia

21

6

5

(32/50)

64 %

 Europe

6

0

2

(8/50)

16 %

 North America

1

0

0

(1/50)

2 %

 New Zealand

0

2

0

(2/50)

4 %