Response of human dental pulp cells to a silver-containing PLGA/TCP-nanofabric as a potential antibacterial regenerative pulp-capping material
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 May 2016
Accepted: 14 February 2017
Published: 27 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 May 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ryan Moseley|
|25 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas C. Lobner|
|13 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Cvikl|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|13 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ryan Moseley|
|10 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Barbara Cvikl|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12903-017-0348-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.