From: The complete digital workflow in fixed prosthodontics: a systematic review
Timeline | Up to 2016–09-16 |
---|---|
P – I – C – O | Problem {(“Dental Prosthesis” [MeSH]) OR (“Crowns” [MeSH]) OR (“Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported” [MeSH] OR (“Crowns, Implant-Supported” [MeSH]) OR (crown) OR (fixed dental prosthesis) OR (fixed reconstruction) OR (dental bridge) OR (implant crown) OR (implant prosthesis) OR (implant restoration) OR (implant reconstruction)} AND |
Intervention {(“Computer-Aided Design” [MeSH]) OR (digital workflow) OR (digital technology) OR (computerized dentistry) OR (intraoral scan) OR (digital impression) OR (scanbody) OR (virtual design) OR (digital design) OR (cad/cam) OR (rapid prototyping) OR (monolithic) OR (full-contour)} AND | |
Control {(“Dental Technology” [MeSH]) OR (conventional workflow) OR (lost-wax-technique) OR (porcelain-fused-to-metal) OR (PFM) OR (implant impression) OR (hand-layering) OR (veneering) OR (framework)} AND | |
Outcome {(“Study, Feasibility” [MeSH]) OR (“Survival” [MeSH]) OR (“Success” [MeSH]) OR (“Economics” [MeSH]) OR (“Costs, Cost Analysis” [MeSH]) OR (“Esthetics, Dental” [MeSH]) OR (“Patient Satisfaction” [MeSH]) OR (feasibility) OR (efficiency) OR (esthetics) OR (patient-centered outcome)} |