Skip to main content

Table 2 Demographic data, study design characteristics and type of brackets used in the publications included in the systematic review

From: Are there differences in treatment effects between labial and lingual fixed orthodontic appliances? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Study authors and design

Demographic data

Type of brackets

Authors

Study design

No. patients (La/Li)

Sex (M/F)

Age labial/lingual (years)

Labial

Lingual

Gorman and Smith 1991 [9]

CCT

120 (60/60)

NA

NA

NA

Ormco Corp., Glendora, Calif.

Soldanova et al. 2012 [7]

CCT

50 (25/25)

11 M/39F

18–54/19–46

Roth (Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany)

Forestadent, St Louis, Missouri, USA.

Wang et al. 2014 [31]

RCT

30 (15/15)

12 M/18F

NA

NA

NA

Deguchi et al. 2015 [8]

R

49 (25/24)

9 M/40F

24.2 ± 4.1/26.4 ± 4.7

NA

STb lingual bracket (Ormco, Orange, Calif)

  1. RCT randomized controlled trial, CCT controlled clinical trial, R retrospective, La/Li number of patients treated with labial/lingual system, M male, F female, NA not available