Skip to main content

Table 1 Association between implementation scales and employees’ characteristics and opinions from a dental care organization in 2015: Linear regression coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (n = 141)

From: Care delivery and compensation system changes: a case study of organizational readiness within a large dental care practice organization in the United States

 

Change Commitment Scale

Change Efficacy Scale

Crude b [95% CI]

Adjusted b$ [95%CI]

Crude b [95% CI]

Adjusted b$ [95%CI]

Support for dental care model

0.43***

[0.20,0.65]

0.09

[−0.16,0.33]

0.37**

[0.13,0.61]

−0.03

[−0.22,0.17]

Support for company’s mission

0.47***

[0.27,0.67]

0.15

[−0.09,0.38]

0.61***

[0.41,0.81]

0.20*

[0.02,0.39]

Support for caries arrest treatments

0.31***

[0.19,0.44]

0.16*

[0.02,0.30]

0.37***

[0.24,0.50]

0.06

[−0.05,0.17]

Organizational climate

0.79***

[0.57,1.01]

0.45**

[0.16,0.75]

1.20***

[1.02,1.39]

0.80***

[0.57,1.04]

Job satisfaction scale

0.39***

[0.24,0.55]

0.09

[−0.13,0.32]

0.63***

[0.49,0.78]

0.08

[−0.10,0.26]

Job stress scale

−0.08

[−0.24,0.08]

0.18

[−0.02,0.38]

−0.32***

[−0.48,-0.16]

0.08

[−0.08,0.24]

Burn out

−0.14*

[−0.27,-0.01]

0.06

[−0.12,0.25]

−0.42***

[−0.54,-0.29]

−0.19*

[−0.33,-0.04]

Office chaos

−0.22*

[−0.40,-0.05]

−0.19*

[−0.38,-0.01]

−0.30**

[−0.48,-0.11]

0.01

[−0.14,0.15]

Likelihood to leave practice

−0.19***

[−0.29,-0.08]

−0.06

[−0.18,0.06]

−0.33***

[−0.43,-0.23]

−0.08

[−0.17,0.02]

Central staff

0.33*

[0.06,0.61]

0.09

[−0.17,0.34]

0.39**

[0.10,0.68]

0.04

[−0.17,0.24]

  1. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001
  2. $The adjusted models contain all variables listed in the table and age, gender, race/ethnicity
Back to article page

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us