Skip to main content

Table 2 Studies quality assessment with EPHPP Quality Assessment Tool

From: Investigating the association between stress, saliva and dental caries: a scoping review

Authors, year

Selection bias

Study design

Con-founders

Blinding

Data collection methods

Withdrawals and dropouts

EPHPP global quality rating

1. Rai K et al., 2010 [44]

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

n/a

Weak

2. Kambalimath et al., 2010 [43]

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Weak

Weak

3. Yfanti et al., 2014 [40]

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

4. Boyce et al., 2010 [30]

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

n/a

Moderate

5. Barbosa et al., 2012 [31]

Moderate

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Strong

n/a

Moderate

6. Pani et al., 2013 [45]

Weak

Weak

Moderate

Moderate

Moderate

n/a

Weak

  1. Global quality rating: ‘strong’: no weak ratings and at least four strong ratings out of six; ‘moderate’: less than four strong ratings and one weak rating; ‘weak’: two or more weak ratings
  2. EPHPP Effective Public Health Practice Project