Are standardized caries risk assessment models effective in assessing actual caries status and future caries increment? A systematic review
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|23 Feb 2018||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joyce Duarte|
|17 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rita Cordeiro|
|18 May 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sergio Uribe|
|6 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Grazia Cagetti|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|9 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sergio Uribe|
|21 Jun 2018||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joyce Duarte|
|27 Jun 2018||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Grazia Cagetti|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Jun 2018||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jul 2018||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jul 2018||Article published||10.1186/s12903-018-0585-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.