Skip to main content

Table 2 Papers included. Association between standardized CRA and actual caries status and/or caries prediction

From: Are standardized caries risk assessment models effective in assessing actual caries status and future caries increment? A systematic review

Authors (year)

Outcome

Subjects

Indices

Caries risk model

Statistical significance

Quality assessment

Children/Adolescents

Gaob, (2015) [8]

CI

544

dmft

Full Cariogram, CAT, CAMBRA, NUS-CRA

+

Good

Sundel, (2015) [21]

ACS

133

dmfs/DMFS

Full Cariogram

+

Good

Cabral, (2014) [22]

ACS

150

dmft/DMFT

Form based on Cariogram 7 factors

++

Poor

Kemparaj, (2014) [37]

CI

200

DMFT/S

Full Cariogram

+

Poor

Gaob, (2013) [36]

CI

544

dmft

Full Cariogram, CAT, CAMBRA, NUS-CRA

+

Good

Zukanovich, (2013) [41]

CI

109

DMFS/DMFT

Full Cariogram, PreViser, CAT

+

Fair

Campus, (2012) [35]

CI

957

DFS

Cariogram 7 factors

+

Good

Hebbal, (2012) [23]

ACS

100

DMFT

Full Cariogram

++

Poor

Kavvadia, (2012) [24]

ACS

814

dmft

Full Cariogram

+

Fair

Gao, (2010) [16]

CI

1576

dmft

Full Cariogram

e

Good

Peterssonc,(2010b) [39]

CI

392

DMFS

Full Cariogram, Cariogram 6 factors

+

Good

Petersson, (2010a) [40]

CI

392

DMFS

Full Cariogram

+

Good

Campus, (2009) [25]

ACS

957

dmfs/DMFS

Cariogram 7 factors

++

Good

Holgerson, (2009) [15]

CI

125

dmfs/DMFS

Full Cariogram

+

Fair

Twetman, (2005) [33]

CI

64

DFS

Full Cariogram

++

Good

Peterssona,b, (2004) [34]

CI

446

DFS

Full Cariogram

++

Good

Peterssonb, (2002) [32]

CI

446

DMFT/S

Full Cariogram

+

Good

Adults

Petersson, (2015) [44]

CI

1295

DFT/DFTS

Full Cariogram

++

Good

Carta, (2015) [31]

ACS

480

ICDAS

Full Cariogram

++

Good

Chaffee, (2015) [45]

CI

4468

DFS

CAMBRA

+

Good

Chang (2014) [30]

CI

110

DMFT/S

Cariogram 7 factors

+

Good

Chang and Kim, (2014) [42]

ACS

102

DMFT

Full Cariogram

+

Good

Lee, (2013) [29]

ACS

80

DMFT

Full Cariogram, Cariogram 7/8 factors

+

Fair

Petersson, (2013) [7]

ACS

1295

DFT/S

Cariogram 8 factors

++

Good

Celik, (2012) [43]

CI

100

DMFT/S

Full Cariogram

+

Fair

Peker, (2012) [27]

ACS

90

DMFT/S

Full Cariogram

+

Fair

Sonbul, (2008) [28]

ACS

175

DMFS

Full Cariogram

+

Good

Ruiz Miravet, (2007) [26]

ACS

48

DMFT/S

Full Cariogram

++

Poor

Peterssona,d, (2004) [34]

CI

208

DFS

Full Cariogram

++

Fair

Peterssond, (2003) [1]

CI

208

DMFS /DFS/DFRS

Full Cariogram

++

Good

Both Children/Adults

Giacaman, (2013) [20]

ACS

180

DMFT

Cariogram 7 factors

–

Poor

Almosa, (2012) [18]

ACS

89

DMFS

Full Cariogram

++

Fair

Al Mulla, (2009) [19]

ACS

100

DFS

Full Cariogram

++

Fair

  1. ACS actual caries status, CI Caries Increment. Subjects: number of subjects at baseline
  2. Statistical significance: - = p > 0.05 + =p < 0.05; ++ = p ≤ 0.01
  3. aPetersson, (2004) reported in both children and adults and describes data in two different samples
  4. bGao, (2013) and (2015), and Petersson, (2002) and (2004) respectively reported data for the same sample of children
  5. cPetersson, (2010a) and (2010b) reported data for the same sample of children
  6. dPetersson, (2003) and (2004) reported data for the same sample of elderly people
  7. eData not obtainable from the paper