Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of clinical and radiographically adjusted dental caries estimates (brackets contain standard deviation unless otherwise indicated)

From: The effect of bitewing radiography on estimates of dental caries experience among children differs according to their disease experience

 

Clinical examination only

Clinical examination and radiographs

Percent difference

p value

Whole-mouth estimates

Prevalencea

316 (63.1%)

374 (74.6%)

18.2

< 0.001

Severity

 Mean dmft

2.4 (2.8) 0–16

3.3 (3.0) 0–16

37.5

< 0.001

 Mean dt

1.6 (2.2) 0–13

2.6 (2.5) 0–13

62.5

< 0.001

 Mean mt

0.0 (0.3) 0–5

0.0 (0.3) 0–5

0.0

> 0.009

 Mean ft

0.8 (1.4) 0–7

0.7 (1.2) 0–6

−12.5

< 0.001

 Mean dmfs

4.6 (6.2) 0–44

5.8 (6.5) 0–45

26.1

< 0.001

 Mean ds

2.1 (3.3) 0–26

3.3 (3.8) 0–30

57.1

< 0.001

 Mean ms

0.1 (0.3) 0–5

0.1 (0.3) 0–5

0.0

> 0.009

 Mean fs

2.5 (5.0) 0–44

2.5 (5.0) 0–44

0.0

> 0.009

Mesial and distal surfaces of molars only

Prevalenceb

266 (53.1%)

343 (68.45)

28.8

< 0.001

Severity

 Mean dfs

2.0 (2.7) 0–17

2.9 (3.1) 0–17

45.0

< 0.001

 Mean ds

1.0 (1.6) 0–11

1.9 (2.1) 0–15

90.0

< 0.001

 Mean fs

1.0 (2.1) 0–17

1.0 (2.1) 0–17

0.0

> 0.009

Occlusal surfaces of molars only

Prevalenceb

250 (49.9%)

283 (56.5%)

13.2

< 0.001

Severity

 Mean dfs

1.6 (2.2) 0–8

1.8 (2.2) 0–8

12.5

< 0.001

 Mean ds

0.6 (1.3) 0–8

0.8 (1.4) 0–8

33.3

< 0.001

 Mean fs

1.0 (1.7) 0–8

1.0 (1.7) 0–8

0.0

> 0.009

  1. Shown as mean (SD) with range unless otherwise specified
  2. aOne or more dmft. bOne or more dfs