Table 2 Patient’s satisfaction survey on several stages
From: Cost-effectiveness of molar single-implant versus fixed dental prosthesis
State | Kennedy Classification | Eichner Classification | Distribution | No. of patients | Age Mean ± 1SD | Distribution parameters Mean ± 1SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Implant | Beta | 168 | 61.7 ± 9.8 | 0.88 ± 0.14 | ||
II | B1-B2 | |||||
lost Implant | Beta | 32 | 61.1 ± 9.4 | 0.71 ± 0.23 | ||
FDP | Beta | 65 | 59.0 ± 11.4 | 0.83 ± 0.13 | ||
III | A2-A3-B1-B2 | |||||
lost FDP | Beta | 66 | 54.8 ± 11.5 | 0.68 ± 0.17 | ||
RPD | II-III | B1-B2 | Beta | 45 | 63.8 ± 10.3 | 0.71 ± 0.23 |
MT | II | B1-B2 | Beta | 184 | 59.1 ± 11.0 | 0.70 ± 0.18 |