Skip to main content

Table 4 Associations between baseline characteristics and dental utilization by 6-month follow-up in multivariable adjusted modela

From: Factors associated with future dental care utilization among low-income smokers overdue for dental visits

  

Use of Dental Care, %

Adjusted RR (95% CI)a

p-value

Age

18 to 44

16.7

1 (ref)

0.96

45 to 64

19.4

0.97 (0.69–1.38)

 

65 or older

17.2

0.89 (0.39–2.03)

 

Gender

Male

17.2

1 (ref)

0.83

Female

19.2

0.97 (0.70–1.33)

 

State

Louisiana

16.5

1 (ref)

0.45

Nebraska

24.2

1.14 (0.75–1.75)

 

Oregon

22.9

1.30 (0.86–1.96)

 

Dental insurance status

No dental insurance

15.1

1 (ref)

0.33

Dental insurance

25.1

1.20 (0.84–1.73)

 

Dental insurance barrier

No such barrier

24.2

1 (ref)

0.61

Dental insurance barrier

16.8

0.90 (0.60–1.35)

 

Cost barrier

No such barrier

23.1

1 (ref)

0.88

Cost barrier

17.5

0.97 (0.64–1.46)

 

Marital status

Single

21.0

1 (ref)

0.02

Married or living as married

14.4

0.67 (0.48–0.94)

 

Education

GED, HS Degree, or less

14.4

1 (ref)

0.013

At least some college, technical, or trade school

23.9

1.52 (1.09–2.12)

 

Living with a disability (employed & unemployed)

No disability

15.2

1 (ref)

0.004

Disability

26.5

1.63 (1.17–2.27)

 

Last dental cleaning

Less than 1 year

36.2

1 (ref)

< 0.001

Over 1 year ago or never

15.7

0.52 (0.37–0.72)

 

Perceived gum disease

No perceived gum disease

15.8

1 (ref)

0.014

Perceived gum disease

22.1

1.49 (1.09–2.05)

 

Motivation to see dentist in next 6 months

Low motivation

7.5

1 (ref)

0.029

High motivation

20.9

2.16 (1.08–4.32)

 

Self-efficacy to see dentist in next 6 months

Low self-efficacy

9.7

1 (ref)

0.019

High self-efficacy

22.7

1.80 (1.10–2.93)

 
  1. Bolded text indicates associations that are significant at the p < 0.05 level
  2. aIncludes our a priori identified covariates (cost barrier, dental insurance barrier, having dental insurance [yes/no], gender, age, and state), as well as each variable found to be significant at the p ≤ 0.10 level in the single variable models (step 1). All p-values are global p-values