Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of logistic regression analysis for children’s caries status in relation to parent’s migration status, children’s sugar consumption and oral health habit (N = 1085)

From: Impact of parental migration on oral health outcomes of left-behind school-aged children in Luchuan, southern China

Variables

Caries status

ORs for caries status (95% CI)

Present (%)

Full model a

Reduced model b

Total

513 (47.3)

  

Gender

 Boy

223 (41.6)

1.00 (referent)

1.00 (referent)

 Girl

290 (52.8)

1.56 (1.22–2.00)

1.59 (1.24, 2.03)

Age (years old)

 8–9

143 (36.4)

1.00 (referent)

1.00 (referent)

 10

137 (53.1)

2.08 (1.50, 2.89)

2.08 (1.51, 2.88)

 11–12

283 (53.7)

2.09 (1.57, 2.73)

2.15 (1.62, 2.86)

Parental migration

 Non-LBC

340 (51.4)

1.00 (referent)

1.00 (referent)

 LBC

173 (40.8)

1.52 (1.09, 2.11)

1.62 (1.26, 2.09)

Type of parental migration

 Non-LBC

173 (40.8)

  

 Father-only migration

113 (53.1)

1.00 (referent)

 

 Mother-only migration

40 (44.9)

0.97 (0.68,1.38)

 

 Both parent migration

187 (52.1)

0.72 (0.45, 1.17)

 

Duration of parental migration

 Non-LBC

173 (40.8)

  

  ≤ 6 months

200 (54.2)

1.00 (referent)

 

  > 6 months

140 (47.9)

1.26 (0.91, 1.74)

 

Frequency sugary snack intake

  < once/day

351 (46.8)

1.00 (referent)

 

  ≥ once/day

162 (48.4)

0.80 (0.59, 1.08)

 

Frequency of sugary beverages intake

  < once/day

384 (48.7)

1.00 (referent)

 

  ≥ once/day

129 (43.6)

1.13 (0.82, 1.56)

 

Frequency of sugar added drink intake

  < once/day

407 (48.2)

1.00 (referent)

 

  ≥ once/day

106 (44.2)

1.17 (0.84, 1.62)

 

Tooth brushing frequency

 Not everyday

43 (41.0)

1.00 (referent)

 

 Once/day

317 (48.2)

1.18 (0.74, 1.88)

 

  ≥ twice/day

153 (47.5)

1.18 (0.76, 1.82)

 
  1. aFull model summary: -2Log likelihood = 1435.627; Cox and Snell R2 = 0.058; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.078; Chi-square for the full model = 65.292; df = 12, p < 0.001; Chi-square for Hosmer and Lemeshow test = 7.585; df = 8; p = 0.475; the overall percentage correct = 59.5
  2. bReduced model summary: -2Log likelihood = 1442.658; Cox and Snell R2 = 0.052; Nagelkerke R2 = 0.070; Chi-square for the reduced model = 58.261; df = 4, p < 0.001; Chi-square for Hosmer and Lemeshow test = 3.818; df = 7; p = 0.800; the overall percentage correct = 59.4