Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of participants and oral conditions.Data is presented as mean ± standard deviation. Multiple comparisons between the robust, pre-frail, and frail groups were performed using one-way analysis of variance and Bonferroni’s modification.BMI, body mass index; NS, not significant; a, significant difference between the robust and frail groups; b, significant difference between the pre-frail and frail groups

From: Relationship between oral environment and frailty among older adults dwelling in a rural Japanese community: a cross-sectional observational study

 

Total (308)

Robust group (203)

Pre-frail group (85)

Frail group (20)

p-value

Age (years)

72.7 ± 0.4

72.1 ± 0.5

73.7 ± 0.6

74.4 ± 1.4

NS

BMI (kg/m2)

22.3 ± 0.2

22.5 ± 0.2

21.9 ± 0.3

21.6 ± 0.5

NS

Teeth number

20.3 ± 0.5

21.1 ± 0.6

19.3 ± 1.0

16.4 ± 2.3

a

Salivary bacterial count (min, max: 1, 7)

5.1 ± 0.1

5.1 ± 0.1

5.2 ± 0.1

4.6 ± 0.2

a, b

Oral moisture

Tongue

27.6 ± 0.3

27.4 ± 0.3

27.9 ± 0.5

27.8 ± 0.9

NS

Bucca

29.6 ± 0.5

29.6 ± 0.8

29.5 ± 0.5

30.2 ± 0.8

NS