Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic characteristics of the sample

From: The effect of mobile personalised texting versus non-personalised texting on the caries risk of underprivileged adults: a randomised control trial

Variables

Participants at randomisation

Participants at follow-up

 

Personalised

Non-personalised

Personalised

Non-personalised

 

(n = 85)

(n = 86)

(n = 56)

(n = 55)

Age, y, n (%)

  < 20

7 (8.2)

5 (5.8)

1 (1.8)

2 (3.6)

 20–29

12 (14.1)

22 (25.6)

7 (12.5)

7 (12.7)

 30–39

28 (32.9)

25 (29.1)

18 (32.1)

17 (30.9)

 40–49

21 (24.7)

18 (20.9)

20 (35.7)

16 (29.1)

 50–59

12 (14.1)

10 (11.6)

6 (10.7)

8 (14.5)

 60–69

5 (5.9)

6 (7.0)

4 (7.1)

5 (9.1)

 Mean (SD)

38.9 (12.8)

37.3 (13.0)

40.9 (11.8)

41.2 (12.3)

 Median (min. to max.)

37 (17–69)a

36 (18–69)a

40 (19–69)

40 (19–69)

Gender, n (%)

 Female

54 (63.5)

64 (74.4)

34 (60.7)

41 (74.5)

Educational level, n (%)

 Less than third level

50 (58.8)

49 (57.0)

31 (55.4)

29 (52.7)

 Third level and more

31 (36.5)

28 (32.6)

25 (44.6)

20 (36.4)

 Still in education

1 (1.2)

6 (7.0)

0 (0.0)

3 (5.5)

 Missing

3 (3.5)

3 (3.5)

0 (0.0)

3 (5.5)

Smoking status, n (%)

 Non-smoker

57 (67.1)

62 (72.1)

43 (76.8)

42 (76.4)

 Smoker

28 (32.9)

24 (27.9)

13 (23.2)

13 (23.6)

Smart phone, n (%)

 Non-possession

15 (17.6)

15 (17.4)

12 (21.4)

12 (21.8)

 Possession

64 (75.3)

64 (74.4)

41 (73.2)

40 (72.7)

 Missing

6 (7.1)

7 (8.1)

3 (5.4)

3 (5.5)

DMFS

 Mean (SD)

31.0 (19.4)

31.7 (18.6)

32.6 (20.2)

34.9 (19.0)

 Median (min. to max.)

33 (0–106)

29.5 (0–66)

33 (1–106)

33 (0–66)

Dental practice, n (%)

 A

1 (1.2)

1 (1.2)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 B

8 (9.4)

14 (16.3)

7 (12.5)

11 (20.0)

 C

9 (10.6)

9 (10.5)

9 (16.1)

9 (16.4)

 D

44 (51.8)

43 (50.0)

32 (57.1)

32 (58.2)

 E

8 (9.4)

7 (8.1)

4 (7.1)

2 (3.6)

 F

1 (1.2)

1 (1.2)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

 G

6 (7.1)

3 (3.5)

1 (1.8)

1 (1.8)

 H

8 (9.4)

8 (9.3)

3 (5.4)

0 (0.0)

  1. SD Standard deviation, DMFS Decayed missing filled tooth surfaces
  2. aSince one dentist did not comply with the inclusion criteria for age, one 17-year-old patient and one 18-year-old patient were included in the personalised group and one 18-year-old patient in the non-personalised group. All of them did not complete the study. See the ‘Subjects’ section for the pre-determined inclusion criteria