Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Mar 2019||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eitan Mijiritsky|
|7 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Vincent Fehmer|
|8 Apr 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Giuseppe Luongo|
|12 Apr 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Francesco Mangano|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|12 Apr 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 May 2019||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hermann Agis|
|2 May 2019||Author responded||Author comments - Francesco Mangano|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 May 2019||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 May 2019||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2019||Article published||10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.