Skip to main content

Table 7 dmft, Care index (CI) and Restorative index (RI) in CLD and CNLD (n = 25 studies; 9 studies with dmft and standard deviations reported). Down syndrome subgroup. Studies where dmft data couldn’t be used are shown in learning disability subgroup tables, with reasons why, but are not included in calculations. All data were calculated from the primary data reported in Additional file 1: Appendix 2

From: Dental caries experience, care index and restorative index in children with learning disabilities and children without learning disabilities; a systematic review and meta-analysis

Down syndrome (primary teeth; n = 11 studies)

Study

Number of participants

Ages

dmft/deft data

CLD

CNLD

CLD dmft / deft (sd)

CNLD dmft / deft (sd)

CLD CI

CNLD CI

CLD RI

CNLD RI

Reason no DMFT data included

Al Habashneh 2012 [15]

103

103

12–16

      

No dmft/deft data

AlSarheed 2015 [17]

93

99

7–15

      

No dmft/deft data

Areias 2013 [18]

45

45

6–18

      

No dmft/deft data

Cogulu 2006 [65]

73

70

7–12

      

No dmft/deft data

Cornejo 1996 [29, 49]

86

86

7–9

2.40 (0.60)

1.70 (0.30)

     

Davidovich 2010 [21]

70

32

1–9

      

No dmft/deft data

Hashizume 2017 [25]

61

52

6–14

1.84 (3.67)

0.98 (1.39)

     

Lee 2004 [61]

19

41

8–17

      

No dmft/deft data

Mathias 2011 [27]

69

69

1–7

      

No dmft/deft data

Stabholz 1991 [63]

32

30

8–13

      

No dmft/deft data

Subramaniam 2014 [29]

34

34

7–12

2.69 (1.62)

2.90 (1.60)

     

Subgroup Total

685

661

        

Mean (sd)

62.27 (±26.97)

60.09 (±26.90)

 

2.31 (±0.43)

1.86 (±0.97)

    Â