Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics of the included studies

From: The impact of surgery-first approach on the oral health-related quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study

Country

Institution

Participants (N)

type of malocclusion

Outcomes

Follow-ups after bonding

Follow-ups after surgery

Park 2015

Korea

Not reported

SFA group: 9F, 2 M

CTM group: 12F, 3 M

skeletal Class III

OQLQ

–

3 months, debonding

Huang 2016

China

Department of Orthodontic at the Stomatology Hospital of Wen Zhou Medical University

SFA group: 13F, 12 M

CTM group: 13F, 12 M

skeletal Class III

OHIP-14

1, 6, 12, 18 months

1, 6, 12 months, debonding

Feu 2017

Brazil

Rio de Janeiro State University

SFA group: 8

CTM group: 8

skeletal Class III

OQLQ,

OHIP-14

1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months

–

Pelo 2016

Italy

Department of Surgical Sciences for Head and Neck Diseases at Catholic University of Sacred Heart

SFA group: 15

CTM group: 15

skeletal Class II/III

OQLQ,

OHIP-14

–

1 month, debonding

  1. Conventional Three-stage Method, CTM Surgery First Approach, SFA Number, N Female, F Male, M Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire, OQLQ 14-item Oral Health Impact Profile, OHIP-14