Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The accuracy and reliability of digital measurements of gingival recession versus conventional methods

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Mar 2019 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andy Yeung
25 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fabrizia Luongo
26 Apr 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberto Rongo
7 May 2019 Author responded Author comments - Hytham Fageeh
Resubmission - Version 2
7 May 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 May 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andy Yeung
2 Jun 2019 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Roberto Rongo
4 Jun 2019 Author responded Author comments - Hytham Fageeh
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jun 2019 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
9 Jul 2019 Editorially accepted
16 Jul 2019 Article published 10.1186/s12903-019-0851-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement