Skip to main content

Table 6 Number of restorations evaluated, for each experimental group, classified according to the adapted USPHS criteria at T1 and T2 times

From: Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin – a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial

 Scores“Decision”T1T2
ERSEESEERSEESE
Marginal stainingAlphaAcceptable505050424242
Bravo̶̶̶444
CharlieNot acceptable̶̶̶̶̶̶
FractureAlphaAcceptable504950464645
Bravo̶̶̶̶̶1
CharlieNot acceptable̶1̶̶̶̶
RetentionAlphaAcceptable505050464646
Bravo̶̶̶̶̶̶
CharlieNot acceptable̶̶̶̶̶̶
Marginal adaptationAlphaAcceptable505049454445
Bravo̶̶1121
CharlieNot acceptable̶̶̶̶̶̶
Postoperative sensitivityAlphaAcceptable474747464646
Bravo̶̶̶̶̶̶
CharlieNot acceptable3a,b,c3d,e,f3g,h,i̶̶̶
Recurrence of cariesAlphaAcceptable505050464646
Bravo̶̶̶̶̶̶
CharlieNot acceptable̶̶̶̶̶̶
  1. Abbreviations T1- first evaluation; T2- second evaluation; ER- Etch-and-rinse; SEE- Selective Enamel Etch; SE- Self-Etch. Letters overwritten: a.patient 29 tooth 16; b.patient 39 tooth 17; c.patient 46 tooth 36; d.patient 28 tooth 15; e.patient 39 tooth 36; f. patient 48 tooth 36; g. patient 8 tooth 16; h.patient 39 tooth 37; i.patient 49 tooth 46