Skip to main content

Table 7 Number of restorations evaluated, for each experimental group, classified according to the adapted FDI criteria at T1 and T2 times

From: Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin – a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial

 

D

*

T1

T2

 

D

*

T1

T2

ER

SEE

SE

ER

SEE

SE

ER

SEE

SE

ER

SEE

SE

Surface lustre

A

1

50

50

49

45

46

44

Approximal anatomical form contact point

(nR Class II = 54)

A

1

14

19

16

11

14

12

2

̶

̶

1

1

̶

2

2

̶

̶

̶

̶

1

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

2

1

2

3

2

4

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Staining surface

A

1

49

50

50

33

43

38

Approximal anatomical form contour

(nR Class II = 54)

A

1

15

20

16

13

16

14

2

1

̶

̶

10

2

7

2

1

̶

2

1

1

2

3

̶

̶

̶

2

1

1

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

1a

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Staining margin

A

1

50

50

49

42

42

42

Patient’s view

A

1

50

50

49

46

46

46

2

̶

̶

1

3

4

3

2

̶

̶

1

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

1

̶

1

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Color match and translucency

A

1

47

46

46

42

41

41

Postoperative (hyper-)sensitivity and tooth vitality

A

1

47

47

47

45

46

46

2

2

4

4

2

4

4

2

3

3

3

1

̶

̶

3

1

̶

̶

1

1

1

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

1a

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Esthetic anatomical form

A

1

49

47

47

45

42

43

Recurrence of caries (CAR), erosion, abfraction

A

1

50

50

50

46

46

46

2

1

3

3

1

4

3

2

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Fracture of material and retention

A

1

50

49

50

46

46

45

Tooth integrity (enamel cracks, tooth fractures)

A

1

50

50

50

46

46

46

2

̶

1

̶

̶

̶

1

2

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Marginal adaptation

A

1

50

50

49

45

44

45

Periodontal response

(nR Class II = 54)

A

1

16

20

18

14

17

16

2

̶

̶

1

1

1

1

2

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

1

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Occlusal contour and wear (qlt)

A

1

48

50

49

44

45

45

Adjacent mucosa

A

1

50

50

50

46

46

46

2

2

̶

1

1

1

1

2

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

1b

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

Occlusal contour and wear (qtt)

A

1

49

50

50

45

46

46

Oral and general health

A

1

50

50

50

46

46

46

2

1

̶

̶

1

̶

̶

2

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

3

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

NA

4

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

5

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

̶

  1. Abbreviations: D- Decision; A- Acceptable; NA- Not acceptable; T1- first evaluation; T2- second evaluation; ER- Etch-and-rinse; SEE- Selective Enamel Etch; SE- Self-Etch. NA- not applicable, nR - number of restorations. * Scores: 1- Clinically very good; 2- Clinically good; 3- Clinically sufficient/satisfactory; 4- Clinically unsatisfactory; 5- Clinically bad. Letters overwritten: a.patient 1 tooth 47; b.patient 21 tooth 26