Skip to main content

Table 4 Methodological quality of the longitudinal studies

From: Effect of smoking cessation on tooth loss: a systematic review with meta-analysis

 

Selection

(maximum 4)

Comparability

(maximum 2)

Outcome

(maximum 3)

Statistics

(maximum 2)

Total

(maximum 11)

Dietrich et al. 2007

2

2

2

2

8

Dietrich et al. 2015

2

2

2

2

8

Jansson & Laystedt. 2002

4

1

2

2

9

Klein et al. 2004

3

1

1

1

6

Krall et al. 1997

3

0

1

2

6

Krall et al. 2006

3

1

2

2

8

Okamoto et al. 2006

1

1

2

2

6

  1. Scores ranged from 0 to 11 stars. Studies with 9–11 stars were arbitrarily rated as low risk of bias, 6–8 stars moderate risk of bias and < 6 high risk of bias