Skip to main content

Table 1 Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons (independent-samples t tests) of the enamel reduction efficiency in mm of removed enamel. Mean values obtained from 24 cycles performed for 3 oscillating strips and 24 cycles performed for 3 manual strips

From: Comparison of the abrasive properties of two different systems for interproximal enamel reduction: oscillating versus manual strips

Variable

Oscillating mechanical system (3 strips)

Manual system (3 strips)

Diff.

P value

95% CI of the difference

Mean

SD

Mean

SD

Lower

Upper

Enamel reduction (mm)

0.16

0.04

0.09

0.04

0.07

0.004*

0.025

0.110

  1. SD Standard Deviations, Diff. Differences, CI Confidence interval
  2. * p < 0.005
Back to article page

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us