Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison of current study with other studies

From: Investigating the anatomical relationship between the maxillary molars and the sinus floor in a Chinese population using cone-beam computed tomography

Project

Object

Sample number

Vertical relationship between the roots of the maxillary molar and the MSF

Distance between the root apices and the MSF

MSF thickness of the cortical bone closest to root apices

MSF thickness of the mucosa closest to root apices

Apical protrusion over the inferior wall of the sinus

The angle between the buccal and palatal roots of the maxillary molar

Current study

Chinese populaion

200 patients

The most common relationship was the MSF above the connection of the buccal and palatal root apices for first and second molar.

The shortest were observed at the mesiobuccal root of the left second molar, 1.57 ± 3.33 mm.

The thinnest were observed at the mesiobuccal root of the right second molar, 0.46 ± 0.28 mm.

The thinnest were observed at the distobuccal root of the right second molar,1.52 ± 0.85 mm.

It was most often occurred in the mesiobuccal root of left second molar (frequency, 20.5%).

The largest was observed in the right first molar (56.47 ± 29.30) when the MSF is located above the connection between the buccal and palatal root apices.

Estrela et al .[7]

Brazilian population

202 patients

The most common relationship was the MSF located below the level connecting the buccal and palatal root apices without an apical protrusion over the MSF for first and second molar.

The shortest were observed at the mesiobuccal root of the second molar, 0.36 ± 1.17 mm.

The thinnest were observed at the mesiobuccal root of the left second molar, 0.65 ± 0.41 mm.

NA

It was most often occurred in the second molar (frequency, 40%).

NA

Razumova et al .[13]

Russian population

325 patients

The most common relationship was MSF located below the level connecting the buccal and palatal root apices without an apical protrusion over the MSF for first and second

NA

The thinnest were observed at the mesiobuccal root of the second molar, 0.54 ± 1.19 mm.

NA

NA

NA

Yurdabakan et al .[14]

Turkish population

394 patients

The most common relationship was the MSF above the connection of the buccal and palatal root apices for the third molar.

NA

NA

NA

The frequency of maxillary third molar protusion into the MSF was 40.4%.

NA