Table 4 The percentages of different types of implant length that had caused overestimation
Implant length (mm) | Jaw | Site | Amount of overestimation (mm) | N | % of total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8 | Mandible | 1M | - 0.2 | 1 | 0.7 |
8 | Mandible | 1M | - 1.6 | 1 | 0.7 |
8 | Mandible | 2M | - 0.2 | 3 | 2 |
8 | Mandible | 2P | - 0.2 | 1 | 0.7 |
10 | Maxilla | 2P | - 0.4 | 1 | 0.7 |
10 | Mandible | 1P | - 0.2 | 1 | 0.7 |
12 | Mandible | 2M | - 0.2 | 2 | 1.3 |
Total | Â | 10 | 6.8 | ||