Skip to main content

Table 2 MIH perception, clinical appearance and prevalence according to study participants

From: Perception, knowledge, and attitudes towards molar incisor hypomineralization among Spanish dentists: a cross-sectional study

Question

Total

n (%)

GDPs

n (%)

PDs

n (%)

P-Value

How often do you notice hypomineralized teeth in your practice?

214 (100)

148 (100)

66 (100)

< 0.001

 Weekly

88 (41.12)

40 (27.02)

48 (72.73)

 Monthly

104 (48.59)

88 (59.46)

16 (24.24)

 Annually

22 (10.28)

20 (13.50)

2 (3.03)

Approximately what percentage of your patients present this defect?

214 (100)

148 (100)

66 (100)

< 0.001

 < 10%

104 (48.59)

88 (59.45)

16 (24.24)

 10–25%

87 (40.65)

54 (36.48)

33 (50.00)

 > 25%

23 (10.74)

6 (4.05)

17 (25.76)

Do you perceive that the incidence of MIH has increased in recent years?

214 (100)

148 (100)

66 (100)

< 0.001

 No

41 (19.15)

38 (25.67)

3 (4.54)

 Yes

173 (80.84)

110 (74.32)

63 (95.45)

What do you most frequently notice in your practice?

214 (100)

148 (100)

66 (100)

0.375

 White demarcated opacities

78 (36.45)

58 (39.19)

20 (30.30)

 Yellow/brown demarcated opacities

129 (60.28)

86 (58.11)

43 (65.16)

 Post-eruptive enamel breakdown

7 (3.27)

4 (2.7)

3 (4.54)

How frequently do you notice this defect in the second primary molar?

210 (100)

144 (100)

66 (100)

0.516

 More often

9 (4.28)

5 (3.47)

4 (6.06)

 Equally as often

15 (17.14)

12 (8.33)

3 (4.54)

 Less often

186 (88.57)

127 (88.19)

59 (89.39)

  1. GDPs General dental practitioners, PDs Pediatric dentists