Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics (error in μm, medians and quartiles, means and 95% CIs) for mesh/mesh and nurbs/nurbs evaluations

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

Scanner

Mesh/Mesh

Nurbs/Nurbs

Median (Q1–Q3)

Mean (95% CI)

Median (Q1–Q3)

Mean (95% CI)

CS 3600®

35.5 (31.5–46.0)

36.5 [29.8; 44.6]

23.5 (21.5–34.0)

24.4 [18.0; 33.1]

CS 3700®

29.5 (27.2–34.5)

30.4 [26.7; 34.5]

22.0 (19.8–24.8)

21.9 [19.3; 25.0]

DWIO®

90.5 (84.2–110.8)

98.4 [84.4; 114.8]

65.0 (51.0–82.2)

69.9 [55.0; 88.9]

EMERALD®

76.0 (67.5–81.0)

76.1 [68.1; 85.1]

54.5 (40.8–60.5)

51.9 [43.5; 61.8]

EMERALD S®

51.0 (46.5–54.8)

52.9 [46.8; 59.7]

37.0 (31.2–40.8)

36.8 [31.1; 43.6]

ITERO ELEMENTS 5D®

32.0 (30.2–33.8)

31.4 [29.2; 33.8]

15.0 (14.2–16.8)

16.1 [12.9; 20.1]

MEDIT I-500®

31.5 (29.0–33.8)

32.2 [28.4; 36.6]

20.5 (17.5–25.8)

20.8 [16.9; 25.5]

OMNICAM®

80.5 (72.2–90.8)

79.6 [66.9; 94.6]

56.0 (33.2–62.5)

47.0 [33.7; 65.7]

PRIMESCAN®

39.5 (35.5–41.8)

38.4 [35.8; 41.2]

19.0 (17.0–23.8)

19.3 [16.3; 22.9]

RUNEYES®

41.5 (33.5–56.0)

44.4 [34.9; 56.5]

32.5 (26.0–43.0)

33.9 [26.4; 43.6]

TRIOS 3®

36.0 (35.2–38.5)

36.4 [33.9; 39.1]

20.5 (19.0–23.0)

20.2 [18.1; 22.7]

VIRTUO VIVO®

38.0 (35.2–42.2)

43.8 [33.6; 57.1]

28.0 (26.2–33.2)

32.0 [24.4; 42.0]