Skip to main content

Table 2 Descriptive statistics (error in μm, medians and quartiles, means and 95% CIs) for mesh/mesh and nurbs/nurbs evaluations

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

Scanner Mesh/Mesh Nurbs/Nurbs
Median (Q1–Q3) Mean (95% CI) Median (Q1–Q3) Mean (95% CI)
CS 3600® 35.5 (31.5–46.0) 36.5 [29.8; 44.6] 23.5 (21.5–34.0) 24.4 [18.0; 33.1]
CS 3700® 29.5 (27.2–34.5) 30.4 [26.7; 34.5] 22.0 (19.8–24.8) 21.9 [19.3; 25.0]
DWIO® 90.5 (84.2–110.8) 98.4 [84.4; 114.8] 65.0 (51.0–82.2) 69.9 [55.0; 88.9]
EMERALD® 76.0 (67.5–81.0) 76.1 [68.1; 85.1] 54.5 (40.8–60.5) 51.9 [43.5; 61.8]
EMERALD S® 51.0 (46.5–54.8) 52.9 [46.8; 59.7] 37.0 (31.2–40.8) 36.8 [31.1; 43.6]
ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® 32.0 (30.2–33.8) 31.4 [29.2; 33.8] 15.0 (14.2–16.8) 16.1 [12.9; 20.1]
MEDIT I-500® 31.5 (29.0–33.8) 32.2 [28.4; 36.6] 20.5 (17.5–25.8) 20.8 [16.9; 25.5]
OMNICAM® 80.5 (72.2–90.8) 79.6 [66.9; 94.6] 56.0 (33.2–62.5) 47.0 [33.7; 65.7]
PRIMESCAN® 39.5 (35.5–41.8) 38.4 [35.8; 41.2] 19.0 (17.0–23.8) 19.3 [16.3; 22.9]
RUNEYES® 41.5 (33.5–56.0) 44.4 [34.9; 56.5] 32.5 (26.0–43.0) 33.9 [26.4; 43.6]
TRIOS 3® 36.0 (35.2–38.5) 36.4 [33.9; 39.1] 20.5 (19.0–23.0) 20.2 [18.1; 22.7]
VIRTUO VIVO® 38.0 (35.2–42.2) 43.8 [33.6; 57.1] 28.0 (26.2–33.2) 32.0 [24.4; 42.0]