Skip to main content

Table 3 Mesh/mesh evaluation. Differences (with standard errors) are presented at the top and right of the table, and correspond to row scanner names minus column scanner names. p-values for comparison are placed at the bottom and left of the table

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

  CS 3600® CS 3700® DWIO® EMERALD® EMERALD S® ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® MEDIT I-500® OMNICAM® PRIMESCAN® RUNEYES® TRIOS 3® VIRTUO VIVO®
CS 3600®   0.08 (0.05) −0.43 (0.06) − 0.32 (0.05) − 0.16 (0.05) 0.06 (0.05) 0.05 (0.05) − 0.34 (0.06) − 0.02 (0.05) − 0.09 (0.07) 0.00 (0.05) − 0.08 (0.07)
CS 3700® 0.9   −0.51 (0.04) −0.40 (0.04) − 0.24 (0.04) −0.01 (0.03) − 0.03 (0.04) −0.42 (0.05) − 0.10 (0.03) −0.16 (0.06) − 0.08 (0.03) − 0.16 (0.06)
DWIO® < 0.0001 < 0.0001   0.11 (0.04) 0.27 (0.04) 0.50 (0.04) 0.49 (0.04) 0.09 (0.05) 0.41 (0.04) 0.35 (0.06) 0.43 (0.04) 0.35 (0.07)
EMERALD® < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.2   0.16 (0.04) 0.38 (0.03) 0.37 (0.04) −0.02 (0.05) 0.30 (0.03) 0.23 (0.06) 0.32 (0.03) 0.24 (0.06)
EMERALD S® 0.09 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.002   0.23 (0.03) 0.22 (0.04) −0.18 (0.05) 0.14 (0.03) 0.08 (0.06) 0.16 (0.03) 0.08 (0.06)
ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001   −0.01 (0.03) −0.40 (0.04) − 0.09 (0.02) −0.15 (0.06) − 0.06 (0.02) −0.14 (0.06)
MEDIT I-500® 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 1.0   −0.39 (0.05) −0.08 (0.03) − 0.14 (0.06) −0.05 (0.03) − 0.13 (0.06)
OMNICAM® < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.8 1.0 0.01 < 0.0001 < 0.0001   0.32 (0.04) 0.25 (0.07) 0.34 (0.04) 0.26 (0.07)
PRIMESCAN® 1.0 0.08 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0009 0.007 0.4 < 0.0001   −0.06 (0.06) 0.02 (0.02) −0.06 (0.06)
RUNEYES® 1.0 0.2 < 0.0001 0.006 1.0 0.2 0.5 0.009 1.0   0.09 (0.06) 0.01 (0.08)
TRIOS 3® 1.0 0.4 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.2 0.9 < 0.0001 1.0 0.9   −0.08 (0.06)
VIRTUO VIVO® 1.0 0.4 < 0.0001 0.01 1.0 0.4 0.6 0.02 1.0 1.0 1.0