Skip to main content

Table 4 Nurbs/nurbs evaluation. Differences (with standard errors) are presented at the top and right of the table, and correspond to row scanner names minus column scanner names. p-values for comparison are placed at the bottom and left of the table

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

 

CS 3600®

CS 3700®

DWIO®

EMERALD®

EMERALD S®

ITERO ELEMENTS 5D®

MEDIT I-500®

OMNICAM®

PRIMESCAN®

RUNEYES®

TRIOS 3®

VIRTUO VIVO®

CS 3600®

 

0.05 (0.07)

−0.46 (0.09)

−0.33 (0.08)

− 0.18 (0.08)

0.18 (0.08)

0.07 (0.08)

−0.28 (0.10)

0.10 (0.08)

−0.14 (0.09)

0.08 (0.07)

−0.12 (0.09)

CS 3700®

1.0

 

−0.50 (0.06)

−0.37 (0.05)

− 0.23 (0.05)

0.13 (0.06)

0.02 (0.05)

−0.33 (0.08)

0.05 (0.05)

−0.19 (0.06)

0.03 (0.04)

−0.16 (0.07)

DWIO®

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

 

0.13 (0.07)

0.28 (0.06)

0.64 (0.07)

0.53 (0.07)

0.17 (0.09)

0.56 (0.06)

0.31 (0.08)

0.54 (0.06)

0.34 (0.08)

EMERALD®

0.003

< 0.0001

0.7

 

0.15 (0.05)

0.51 (0.06)

0.40 (0.06)

0.04 (0.08)

0.43 (0.05)

0.18 (0.07)

0.41 (0.05)

0.21 (0.07)

EMERALD S®

0.5

0.0003

0.002

0.2

 

0.36 (0.06)

0.25 (0.06)

−0.11 (0.08)

0.28 (0.05)

0.04 (0.07)

0.26 (0.04)

0.06 (0.07)

ITERO ELEMENTS 5D®

0.6

0.4

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

 

−0.11 (0.07)

−0.47 (0.09)

− 0.08 (0.06)

−0.32 (0.07)

− 0.10 (0.05)

−0.30 (0.08)

MEDIT I-500®

1.0

1.0

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.002

0.9

 

−0.35 (0.09)

0.03 (0.06)

−0.21 (0.07)

0.01 (0.05)

−0.19 (0.07)

OMNICAM®

0.2

0.003

0.8

1.0

1.0

< 0.0001

0.004

 

0.39 (0.08)

0.14 (0.09)

0.37 (0.08)

0.17 (0.09)

PRIMESCAN®

1.0

1.0

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

1.0

1.0

0.0005

 

−0.24 (0.07)

−0.02 (0.05)

−0.22 (0.07)

RUNEYES®

0.9

0.1

0.004

0.2

1.0

0.001

0.1

0.9

0.02

 

0.22 (0.06)

0.03 (0.08)

TRIOS 3®

1.0

1.0

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.8

1.0

0.0004

1.0

0.01

 

−0.20 (0.06)

VIRTUO VIVO®

1.0

0.4

0.002

0.1

1.0

0.009

0.3

0.8

0.09

1.0

0.10

Â