Skip to main content

Table 4 Nurbs/nurbs evaluation. Differences (with standard errors) are presented at the top and right of the table, and correspond to row scanner names minus column scanner names. p-values for comparison are placed at the bottom and left of the table

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

  CS 3600® CS 3700® DWIO® EMERALD® EMERALD S® ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® MEDIT I-500® OMNICAM® PRIMESCAN® RUNEYES® TRIOS 3® VIRTUO VIVO®
CS 3600®   0.05 (0.07) −0.46 (0.09) −0.33 (0.08) − 0.18 (0.08) 0.18 (0.08) 0.07 (0.08) −0.28 (0.10) 0.10 (0.08) −0.14 (0.09) 0.08 (0.07) −0.12 (0.09)
CS 3700® 1.0   −0.50 (0.06) −0.37 (0.05) − 0.23 (0.05) 0.13 (0.06) 0.02 (0.05) −0.33 (0.08) 0.05 (0.05) −0.19 (0.06) 0.03 (0.04) −0.16 (0.07)
DWIO® < 0.0001 < 0.0001   0.13 (0.07) 0.28 (0.06) 0.64 (0.07) 0.53 (0.07) 0.17 (0.09) 0.56 (0.06) 0.31 (0.08) 0.54 (0.06) 0.34 (0.08)
EMERALD® 0.003 < 0.0001 0.7   0.15 (0.05) 0.51 (0.06) 0.40 (0.06) 0.04 (0.08) 0.43 (0.05) 0.18 (0.07) 0.41 (0.05) 0.21 (0.07)
EMERALD S® 0.5 0.0003 0.002 0.2   0.36 (0.06) 0.25 (0.06) −0.11 (0.08) 0.28 (0.05) 0.04 (0.07) 0.26 (0.04) 0.06 (0.07)
ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® 0.6 0.4 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001   −0.11 (0.07) −0.47 (0.09) − 0.08 (0.06) −0.32 (0.07) − 0.10 (0.05) −0.30 (0.08)
MEDIT I-500® 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.002 0.9   −0.35 (0.09) 0.03 (0.06) −0.21 (0.07) 0.01 (0.05) −0.19 (0.07)
OMNICAM® 0.2 0.003 0.8 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 0.004   0.39 (0.08) 0.14 (0.09) 0.37 (0.08) 0.17 (0.09)
PRIMESCAN® 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 1.0 1.0 0.0005   −0.24 (0.07) −0.02 (0.05) −0.22 (0.07)
RUNEYES® 0.9 0.1 0.004 0.2 1.0 0.001 0.1 0.9 0.02   0.22 (0.06) 0.03 (0.08)
TRIOS 3® 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.8 1.0 0.0004 1.0 0.01   −0.20 (0.06)
VIRTUO VIVO® 1.0 0.4 0.002 0.1 1.0 0.009 0.3 0.8 0.09 1.0 0.10