Skip to main content

Table 6 Linear distances. Differences (with standard errors) are presented at the top and right of the table, and correspond to row scanner names minus column scanner names. p-values for comparison are placed at the bottom and left of the table

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

 

CS 3600®

CS 3700®

DWIO®

EMERALD®

EMERALD S®

ITERO ELEMENTS 5D®

MEDIT I-500®

OMNICAM®

PRIMESCAN®

RUNEYES®

TRIOS 3®

VIRTUO VIVO®

CS 3600®

 

−4.1 (8.9)

73.5 (18.7)

37.1 (11.6)

38.8 (7.2)

−1.8 (4.5)

− 0.8 (5.5)

3.6 (10.3)

−2.2 (4.2)

−19.4 (6.0)

22.4 (8.2)

15.0 (9.1)

CS 3700®

1.0

 

77.7 (20.5)

41.2 (17.2)

42.9 (11.4)

2.3 (12.6)

3.3 (11.3)

7.8 (7.7)

1.9 (7.5)

−15.2 (10.9)

26.6 (14.2)

19.2 (6.8)

DWIO®

0.005

0.009

 

−36.5 (26.3)

−34.8 (24.8)

−75.4 (17.8)

−74.4 (14.4)

−69.9 (23.7)

− 75.8 (15.4)

−92.9 (15.0)

−51.1 (13.0)

−58.5 (24.3)

EMERALD®

0.06

0.4

1.0

 

1.7 (14.3)

−38.9 (11.4)

−37.9 (12.5)

− 33.5 (12.5)

−39.3 (14.2)

−56.5 (16.1)

−14.7 (13.6)

−22.1 (14.2)

EMERALD S®

< 0.0001

0.010

1.0

1.0

 

−40.6 (9.4)

−39.6 (12.6)

−35.1 (13.1)

−41.0 (10.8)

−58.1 (11.2)

−16.3 (14.9)

−23.7 (10.4)

ITERO ELEMENTS 5D®

1.0

1.0

0.002

0.03

0.001

 

1.0 (5.1)

5.4 (12.8)

− 0.4 (6.8)

−17.6 (7.9)

24.2 (6.1)

16.8 (13.4)

MEDIT I-500®

1.0

1.0

< 0.0001

0.1

0.08

1.0

 

4.4 (12.0)

−1.4 (4.2)

−18.6 (6.4)

23.2 (3.1)

15.8 (12.7)

OMNICAM®

1.0

1.0

0.1

0.2

0.2

1.0

1.0

 

−5.8 (10.4)

−23.0 (14.7)

18.8 (14.5)

11.4 (8.4)

PRIMESCAN®

1.0

1.0

< 0.0001

0.2

0.008

1.0

1.0

1.0

 

−17.2 (4.8)

24.6 (7.1)

17.2 (9.7)

RUNEYES®

0.06

1.0

< 0.0001

0.02

< 0.0001

0.5

0.1

0.9

0.02

 

41.8 (8.2)

34.4 (11.7)

TRIOS 3®

0.2

0.8

0.005

1.0

1.0

0.005

< 0.0001

1.0

0.03

< 0.0001

 

−7.4 (15.7)

VIRTUO VIVO®

0.9

0.2

0.4

0.9

0.5

1.0

1.0

1.0

0.8

0.1

1.0

Â