Skip to main content

Table 6 Linear distances. Differences (with standard errors) are presented at the top and right of the table, and correspond to row scanner names minus column scanner names. p-values for comparison are placed at the bottom and left of the table

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

  CS 3600® CS 3700® DWIO® EMERALD® EMERALD S® ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® MEDIT I-500® OMNICAM® PRIMESCAN® RUNEYES® TRIOS 3® VIRTUO VIVO®
CS 3600®   −4.1 (8.9) 73.5 (18.7) 37.1 (11.6) 38.8 (7.2) −1.8 (4.5) − 0.8 (5.5) 3.6 (10.3) −2.2 (4.2) −19.4 (6.0) 22.4 (8.2) 15.0 (9.1)
CS 3700® 1.0   77.7 (20.5) 41.2 (17.2) 42.9 (11.4) 2.3 (12.6) 3.3 (11.3) 7.8 (7.7) 1.9 (7.5) −15.2 (10.9) 26.6 (14.2) 19.2 (6.8)
DWIO® 0.005 0.009   −36.5 (26.3) −34.8 (24.8) −75.4 (17.8) −74.4 (14.4) −69.9 (23.7) − 75.8 (15.4) −92.9 (15.0) −51.1 (13.0) −58.5 (24.3)
EMERALD® 0.06 0.4 1.0   1.7 (14.3) −38.9 (11.4) −37.9 (12.5) − 33.5 (12.5) −39.3 (14.2) −56.5 (16.1) −14.7 (13.6) −22.1 (14.2)
EMERALD S® < 0.0001 0.010 1.0 1.0   −40.6 (9.4) −39.6 (12.6) −35.1 (13.1) −41.0 (10.8) −58.1 (11.2) −16.3 (14.9) −23.7 (10.4)
ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® 1.0 1.0 0.002 0.03 0.001   1.0 (5.1) 5.4 (12.8) − 0.4 (6.8) −17.6 (7.9) 24.2 (6.1) 16.8 (13.4)
MEDIT I-500® 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 0.1 0.08 1.0   4.4 (12.0) −1.4 (4.2) −18.6 (6.4) 23.2 (3.1) 15.8 (12.7)
OMNICAM® 1.0 1.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 1.0 1.0   −5.8 (10.4) −23.0 (14.7) 18.8 (14.5) 11.4 (8.4)
PRIMESCAN® 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001 0.2 0.008 1.0 1.0 1.0   −17.2 (4.8) 24.6 (7.1) 17.2 (9.7)
RUNEYES® 0.06 1.0 < 0.0001 0.02 < 0.0001 0.5 0.1 0.9 0.02   41.8 (8.2) 34.4 (11.7)
TRIOS 3® 0.2 0.8 0.005 1.0 1.0 0.005 < 0.0001 1.0 0.03 < 0.0001   −7.4 (15.7)
VIRTUO VIVO® 0.9 0.2 0.4 0.9 0.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.8 0.1 1.0