Skip to main content

Table 7 Cross distances. Differences (with standard errors) are presented at the top and right of the table, and correspond to row scanner names minus column scanner names. p-values for comparison are placed at the bottom and left of the table

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

  CS 3600® CS 3700® DWIO® EMERALD® EMERALD S® ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® MEDIT I-500® OMNICAM® PRIMESCAN® RUNEYES® TRIOS 3® VIRTUO VIVO®
CS 3600®   55.9 (27.9) 90.9 (35.7) 98.4 (4.2) 226.9 (47.3) 57.0 (27.2) 80.5 (36.4) 18.6 (13.0) 20.6 (23.2) −71.6 (18.5) 154.6 (52.6) 145.2 (32.6)
CS 3700® 0.7   35.0 (23.4) 42.6 (29.5) 171.0 (36.8) 1.1 (4.6) 24.6 (9.4) −37.3 (21.6) −35.2 (10.2) − 127.4 (26.9) 98.8 (25.4) 89.4 (12.1)
DWIO® 0.3 0.9   7.5 (36.8) 136.0 (58.1) −33.9 (26.3) −10.4 (28.0) −72.3 (30.2) −70.3 (16.6) − 162.5 (23.8) 63.7 (39.2) 54.3 (34.8)
EMERALD® < 0.0001 1.0 1.0   128.5 (49.9) −41.4 (29.3) −18.0 (38.3) −79.9 (11.5) − 77.8 (24.4) − 170.0 (17.3) 56.2 (54.4) 46.8 (34.6)
EMERALD S® 0.0001 0.0003 0.5 0.3   −169.9 (32.8) − 146.4 (33.2) − 208.3 (48.4) − 206.3 (45.4) − 298.5 (58.3) −72.3 (36.1) −81.7 (25.0)
ITERO ELEMENTS 5D® 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0 < 0.0001   23.5 (9.3) −38.4 (22.8) −36.4 (13.0) −128.5 (29.0) 97.6 (25.4) 88.3 (9.1)
MEDIT I-500® 0.5 0.3 1.0 1.0 0.0008 0.3   −61.9 (30.8) −59.8 (18.8) − 152.0 (36.0) 74.2 (16.3) 64.8 (10.1)
OMNICAM® 1.0 0.9 0.4 < 0.0001 0.001 0.9 0.7   2.1 (16.4) −90.1 (12.9) 136.1 (46.5) 126.7 (28.7)
PRIMESCAN® 1.0 0.03 0.002 0.07 0.0004 0.2 0.07 1.0   −92.2 (17.4) 134.0 (34.2) 124.6 (21.8)
RUNEYES® 0.007 0.0002 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0007 0.002 < 0.0001 < 0.0001   226.2 (51.5) 216.8 (37.0)
TRIOS 3® 0.1 0.007 0.9 1.0 0.7 0.008 0.0004 0.1 0.006 0.0008   −9.4 (22.1)
VIRTUO VIVO® 0.0006 < 0.0001 0.9 1.0 0.05 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 0.0008 < 0.0001 < 0.0001 1.0