Skip to main content

Table 7 Cross distances. Differences (with standard errors) are presented at the top and right of the table, and correspond to row scanner names minus column scanner names. p-values for comparison are placed at the bottom and left of the table

From: Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study

 

CS 3600®

CS 3700®

DWIO®

EMERALD®

EMERALD S®

ITERO ELEMENTS 5D®

MEDIT I-500®

OMNICAM®

PRIMESCAN®

RUNEYES®

TRIOS 3®

VIRTUO VIVO®

CS 3600®

 

55.9 (27.9)

90.9 (35.7)

98.4 (4.2)

226.9 (47.3)

57.0 (27.2)

80.5 (36.4)

18.6 (13.0)

20.6 (23.2)

−71.6 (18.5)

154.6 (52.6)

145.2 (32.6)

CS 3700®

0.7

 

35.0 (23.4)

42.6 (29.5)

171.0 (36.8)

1.1 (4.6)

24.6 (9.4)

−37.3 (21.6)

−35.2 (10.2)

− 127.4 (26.9)

98.8 (25.4)

89.4 (12.1)

DWIO®

0.3

0.9

 

7.5 (36.8)

136.0 (58.1)

−33.9 (26.3)

−10.4 (28.0)

−72.3 (30.2)

−70.3 (16.6)

− 162.5 (23.8)

63.7 (39.2)

54.3 (34.8)

EMERALD®

< 0.0001

1.0

1.0

 

128.5 (49.9)

−41.4 (29.3)

−18.0 (38.3)

−79.9 (11.5)

− 77.8 (24.4)

− 170.0 (17.3)

56.2 (54.4)

46.8 (34.6)

EMERALD S®

0.0001

0.0003

0.5

0.3

 

−169.9 (32.8)

− 146.4 (33.2)

− 208.3 (48.4)

− 206.3 (45.4)

− 298.5 (58.3)

−72.3 (36.1)

−81.7 (25.0)

ITERO ELEMENTS 5D®

0.6

1.0

1.0

1.0

< 0.0001

 

23.5 (9.3)

−38.4 (22.8)

−36.4 (13.0)

−128.5 (29.0)

97.6 (25.4)

88.3 (9.1)

MEDIT I-500®

0.5

0.3

1.0

1.0

0.0008

0.3

 

−61.9 (30.8)

−59.8 (18.8)

− 152.0 (36.0)

74.2 (16.3)

64.8 (10.1)

OMNICAM®

1.0

0.9

0.4

< 0.0001

0.001

0.9

0.7

 

2.1 (16.4)

−90.1 (12.9)

136.1 (46.5)

126.7 (28.7)

PRIMESCAN®

1.0

0.03

0.002

0.07

0.0004

0.2

0.07

1.0

 

−92.2 (17.4)

134.0 (34.2)

124.6 (21.8)

RUNEYES®

0.007

0.0002

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.0007

0.002

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

 

226.2 (51.5)

216.8 (37.0)

TRIOS 3®

0.1

0.007

0.9

1.0

0.7

0.008

0.0004

0.1

0.006

0.0008

 

−9.4 (22.1)

VIRTUO VIVO®

0.0006

< 0.0001

0.9

1.0

0.05

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

0.0008

< 0.0001

< 0.0001

1.0

Â