Skip to main content

Table 2 Clinical attachment loss (CAL) and probing pocket depth (PPD) in moderate (4–6 mm) and deep sites (≥ 7 mm) at baseline, 3-months and 12-months follow up

From: Clinical effects of probiotic or azithromycin as an adjunct to scaling and root planning in the treatment of stage III periodontitis: a pilot randomized controlled clinical trial

 

Baseline (a)

3 months (b)

12 months (c)

p value (intra-group)

Post-hoc (Bonferroni adjustment)

Effect size (∆3 months-BL)a

Effect size (∆12 months-BL)b

∆3 months-BL

∆12 months-BL

Moderate sites (CAL)

         

Probiotic group (n = 16)

5.6 ± 0.6

6.0 ± 1.0

6.1 ± 1.2

0.0238

a > b (p = 0.1208)

0.4 ± 0.9

0.5 ± 0.9

0.4 ± 0.9

0.5 ± 0.9

     

a > c (p = 0.0747)

    

Antibiotic group (n = 16)

5.9 ± 1.0

6.4 ± 1.3

6.4 ± 1.4

0.0018

a < b (p = 0.0171)

− 0.04 ± 0.7

0.5 ± 1.0

0.7 ± 0.9

0.5 ± 1.0

     

a > c (p = 0.0340)

    

Placebo group (n = 15)

6.1 ± 1.3

6.0 ± 1.7

6.5 ± 1.6

0.0006

a > b (p = 0.7333)

0.7 ± 1.0

0.4 ± 1.0

− 0.04 ± 0.7

0.4 ± 1.0

     

a > c (p = 0.1398)

    

p value (inter-group)

0.4031

0.6160

0.7649

    

0.0857

0.9483

Deep sites (CAL)

         

Probiotic group (n = 16)

8.4 ± 1.8

9.3 ± 2.0

10.8 ± 3.6

0.0498

a > b (p = 0.7127)

0.05 ± 0.9

0.8 ± 1.1

0.1 ± 1.7

1.6 ± 2.2

     

a > c (p = 0.1756)

    

Antibiotic group (n = 16)

9.5 ± 2.1

10.4 ± 2.4

11.2 ± 1.7

0.0498

a > b (p = 0.6858)

0.09 ± 0.6

0.2 ± 0.6

0.2 ± 1.1

0.4 ± 1.1

     

a > c (p = 0.5930)

    

Placebo group (n = 15)

9.5 ± 2.1

11.1 ± 2.0

10.6 ± 2.1

0.3386

a > b (p = 0.2489)

0.4 ± 1.5

0.4 ± 0.8

0.9 ± 2.9

0.8 ± 1.6

     

a > c (p = 0.1763)

    

p value (inter-group)

0.4837

0.3254

0.9420

    

0.8257

0.6535

Moderate sites (PPD)

         

Probiotic group (n = 16)

4.5 ± 0.3

4.4 ± 0.5

4.3 ± 0.3

0.0006

a > b (p = 0.1788)

− 0.2 ± 1.9

− 0.8 ± 1.4

− 0.06 ± 0.5

− 0.2 ± 0.4

     

a > c (p = 0.0464)

    

Antibiotic group (n = 16)

4.5 ± 0.2

4.4 ± 0.3

4.3 ± 0.2

0.0040

a > b (p = 0.0287)

− 0.6 ± 0.8

− 0.8 ± 0.7

− 0.2 ± 0.2

− 0.2 ± 0.2

     

a > c (p = 0.0010)

    

Placebo group (n = 15)

4.6 ± 0.3

4.2 ± 0.2

4.2 ± 0.3

0.0280

a > b (p = 0.0007)

− 1.4 ± 0.9

− 1.3 ± 1.2

− 0.4 ± 0.2

− 0.4 ± 0.3

     

a > c (p = 0.0012)

    

p value (inter-group)

0.6098

0.3097

0.7395

    

0.4489

0.3449

Deep sites (PPD)

         

Probiotic group (n = 16)

7.5 ± 1.0

7.4 ± 0.9

7.9 ± 1.2

0.1054

a > b (p = 0.0947)

− 0.4 ± 0.3

− 0.1 ± 0.3

− 0.4 ± 0.3

− 0.1 ± 0.3

     

a > c (p = 0.5716)

    

Antibiotic group (n = 16)

7.5 ± 0.7

7.7 ± 0.7

7.1 ± 0.2

0.1054

a > b (p = 0.6845)

0.1 ± 1.4

− 0.2 ± 0.1

0.08 ± 1.1

− 0.2 ± 0.08

     

a > c (p = 0.1088)

    

Placebo group (n = 15)

7.8 ± 0.7

7.6 ± 0.9

7.2 ± 0.2

0.6747

a > b (p = 0.3991)

− 0.6 ± 1.8

− 1.0 ± 1.0

− 0.4 ± 1.4

− 0.8 ± 0.8

     

a > c (p = 0.0510)

  

0.7364

0.2588

p value (inter-group)

0.3767

0.2995

0.1862

      
  1. Data presented as mean ± SD; BL: Baseline. CAL: Clinical attachment loss. PPD: Probing pocket depth
  2. aEffect size of (∆3 months‐BL) was calculated by delta mean change from month 3 to baseline over standard deviation of baseline. bEffect size of (∆12 months‐BL) was calculated by delta mean change from month 12 to baseline over standard deviation of baseline
  3. Intra-group comparison by Friedman test (p < 0.05) and Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed rank test (p < 0.025). Statistical significant in bold
  4. Inter-group comparison by ANOVA and Kruskal Wallis test (p < 0.05)