Table 4 Applied assessments for OHRQoL and relevant results for the included studies
Author, year | Assessment of OHRQoL | OHRQoL different compared to control | Association/correlation between OHRQoL and general HRQoL | Association/correlation between OHRQoL and oral health | Association and/or correlation between OHRQoL and disease-related parameters | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better than preTx | Worse than healthy control (HC) | |||||
Segura-Saint-Gerons et al. [22] | OHIP 49: 24.43 | n/a | n/a | n/a | Number of daily tooth-brushing, dental visits in previous year | Gender |
Schmalz et al. [23] | OHIP 14: 2.54 ± 3.68 | No (HD OHIP 14: 2.46 ± 4.68) | No (HC OHIP 14: 1.52 ± 2.71) | n/a | No | No |
Schmalz et al. [24] | OHIP 14: 1.70 ± 2.70 | n/a | No (HC OHIP 14: 1.54 ± 2.86) | n/a | No | No |
Schmalz et al. [25] | OHIP 14: 4.1 [1;0–5] | No (preLTx OHIP 14: 4.2 [1.5; 0–4.0] | Yes (HC OHIP 14: 1.4 [0; 0–2.0] | n/a | No | No |
Ruokonen et al. [21] | 75.1% maximum OHQS score | 71.5%* | n/a | Correlation 15D with OHQS | PPD, PIBI, TDI, number of teeth, UWS | n/a |
Schmalz et al. [26] | OHIP 14: 6.58 ± 6.40 | No (HF OHIP G14: 5.54 ± 5.47) | n/a | Correlation PCS and MCS of SF-36 with OHIP 14 | No | No |
Oduncuoğlu et al. [27] | OHIP 14: 8.9 ± 9.6; OHRQoL-UK: 44.8 ± 10.5 | Yes (HD OHIP 14: 12.28 ± 8.90) | no (HC OHIP 14: 9.0 ± 9.3) | n/a | n/a | Time since TX |