Skip to main content

Table 2 Post hoc comparisons with Tamhane’s T2 test among the radiography groups according to the *WBFPRS

From: Simulation of three intraoral radiographic techniques in pediatric dental patients: subjective comfort assessment using the VAS and Wong-Baker FACES Pain Raiting Scale

(I) Radiography Groups

(J) Radiography Groups

Mean Difference (I-J)

Std. Error

Sig.

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

Conventional Method

PSPL

.280

.187

.371

1859

.745

CCD Sensor

- 680*

.255

.032

−1.3136

.046

**PSPL

Conventional Method

−.280

.187

.371

−.7459

.185

CCD Sensor

−.960*

.238

.001

−1.5561

−.363

***CCD Sensor

Conventional Method

.680*

.255

.032

.0464

1.313

PSPL

.960*

.238

.001

.3639

1.556

  1. *P < 0.05
  2. *WBFPRS Wong-Baker FACES Pain Raiting Scale
  3. **PSPL Photostimulable Phosphor Luminescence
  4. ***CCD Charge-Coupled Device