Skip to main content

Table 1 Mean and standard deviation of dentin thickness (mm) and volume of root canal (mm3) in each group at 3 mm and 5 mm below the cement-enamel junction before and after root canal preparation and fracture resistance (N)

From: Influence of cervical preflaring and root canal preparation on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth

 

3 mm Distal

3 mm Mesial

5 mm Distal

5 mm Mesial

Volume

Fracture resistance

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

 

Control

1.39 a (±0.15)

1.09 b (±0.17)

1.32 a (±0.18)

1.12 b (±0.14)

1.32 a (±0.14)

1.06 b (±0.16)

1.32 a (±0.16)

1.07 b (±0.13)

1.37 a (±1.11)

3.11 b (±1.08)

581.12 A (±117.13)

Gates

1.39 a (±0.22)

1.17 b (±0.18)

1.36 a (±0.17)

1.16 b (±0.22)

1.24 a (±0.19)

1.06 b (±0.21)

1.21 a (±0.14)

1.02 b (±0.14)

1.34 a (±0.41)

2.61 b (±0.56)

404.59 B (±54.46)

WXN

1.45 a (±0.21)

1.24 b (±0.29)

1.51 a (±0.25)

1.25 b (±0.31)

1.31 a (±0.15)

1.11 b (±0.18)

1.37 a (±0.22)

1.15 b (±0.27)

1.90 a (±0.70)

3.16 b (±0.94)

551.47 A (±112.83)

Easy

1.57 a (±0.15)

1.23 b (±0.17)

1.46 a (±0.13)

1.09 b (±0.12)

1.39 a (±0.18)

1.07 b (±0.13)

1.39 a (±0.22)

1.03 b (±0.15)

1.65 a (±0.51)

3.01 b (±0.58)

521.44 A (±86.37)

  1. Different small letters denote differences in pre- and post- microCT images and after fracture resistance test (α = 0.05). Capital letters compare the groups after fracture resistance test (One-way NOVA and Tukey test). The significance level was set at 5%