Skip to main content

Table 3 Clinical results of the studies included in the systematic review and meta-analysis

From: Complete root coverage in the treatment of Miller class III or RT2 gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Class III/R T2 studies (n = 37)

No RC

Complete root coverage

Periodontal clinical parameters (mm)

6 Mo

9 Mo

12 Mo

 > 12 Mo

RC t0

PD t0

PD change

CAL change (- gain)

KTW t0

KTW change

  

n

%

n

%

n

%

n

%

M

  

6 Mo

9 Mo

12Moo M

 > 12 Mo

6 Mo

9 Mo

12 Mo

 > 12 Mo

 

6 Mo

9 Mo

12 Mo

 > 12 Mo

A case report (n = 9)

Cizza and Migues [57] ‡

1

0

0

  

0

0

   

7

2

0

 

0

 

-5

 

-3.50

 

0.50

 + 4

 

 + 4

 

Deliberador et al. [35]†

1

    

0

0

   

7

1

  

-0.50

   

-4.50

      

Gajendran and Parthasarathy [58]†

2

    

2

100

   

3.50

2

  

-1

   

-5.50

 

1.50

  

 + 1.5

 

Luthra et al. [59]‡

2

2

100

  

2

100

                  

Moussa and Bissada [60]†

4

    

3

75

   

3.50

1.25

        

3.50

  

0

 

Rath et al. [61]‡

2

NR

 

1

50

    

4.50

1

        

1.50

  

 + 1

 

1

0

0

 

NR

    

8

NR

        

1

 + 8

   

Rath et al. [62]‡

1

1

100

       

7

2

0

   

-7

   

1

 + 7

   

Ribeiro et al. [31]†

1

      

0

0

36

4

              

Zuchelli and De Sanctis [38]†

1

    

0

0

0

0

60

6

4

  

-3

-3 (60 M)

  

-7

-7 (60 M)

0

  

 + 3

 + 3 (60 M)

Case series (n = 17)

Boltchi et al. [43]‡

14

7

50

                      

Carnio et al. [44]‡

1

0

0

 

NR

   

6

1

0

 

NR

 

-3

 

NR

 

1

 + 3

 

NR

  

1

NR

 

0

0

   

6

2

NR

 

0

 

NR

 

-4

 

0

NR

 

 + 5

  

Cosgarea et al. [45]†

25

    

9

36

                  

Garg et al. [46]†

9

2

40

       

2.80

3.48

-1.73

   

-3.45

        

Gupta et al. [47]‡

7

  

0

0

     

3.57

1.64

 

-0.30

   

-1.85

  

1.50

 

 + 3.50

  

Jepsen et al. [48]‡

8

    

0

0

   

5.40

2.30

  

-0.66

   

-4.49

 

1.94

  

 + 2.69

 

Lee et al. [39]†

1

0

0

   

NR

36

9

              

1

NR

  

0

0

8

              

Nart et al. [49]‡

7

    

3

42.85

 

5.14

  

1.71

  

-0.71

   

-5.01

 

0

  

 + 3

 

Nart and Valles [50]†

7

      

1

14.30

20

4.57

1.14

   

0 (20 M)

   

-3.35 (20 M)

0

   

 + 2.57 (20 M)

Núñez et al. [40]†

7

    

2

28.50

   

6.07

1.29

  

-0.15

   

-4.64

 

0

  

 + 5.71

 

Pini Prato et al. [51]‡

8

    

3

12

NR

240

2.68

1.12

 

-0.04

-0.12 (240 M)

 

-1.64

-0.94 (240 M)

3.40

 

-0.32

-0.77 (240 M)

17

   

NR

0

0

 

NR

NR

NR

NR

Romanos et al. [52]†

48

    

17

35.40

                  

Sato et al. [53]‡

2

    

2

100

NR

24

3.50

1

 

 + 0.50

NR

 

-3

NR

0.75

 

 + 1.25

NR

2

    

NR

1

50

3.50

1.50

NR

 + 0.50 (24 M)

NR

-2.50 (24 M)

0.25

NR

 + 3.75 (24 M)

Sculean et al. [54]†

5

    

1

20

                  

Sculean et al. [55]†

7

    

6

85.70

                  

Sculean and Allen [41]†

10

    

6

60

                  

Yaman et al. [56]†

68

    

34

50

   

2.23

              

RCTS (n = 7)

                         

Aroca et al. [6]†

139 (40 pt)

    

16 pt

40

   

3.35

1.45

-0.30

 

-0.20

 

-3

 

-2,85

 

2.55

 + 0.2

 

 + 0.1

 

Cairo et al. [7]‡

29

12

42.86

       

2.75

1.40

0

   

-2.15

   

2.70

 + 0.65

   

Cueva et al. [14]‡

7

3

42.86

                      

Mercado et al. [42]†

127

    

26

20.47

18

14.17

36

5.61

1.12

  

 + 0.18

 + 0.20 (36)

  

-4.05

-3.43 (36)

1.61

  

 + 1.72

 + 1.87 (36)

Ozcelik et al. [63]†

30

4

13.30

       

6.20

1.33

 + 0.27*

   

-0.42*

   

0

 + 4.47*

   

Ozcelik et al. [65]‡

62

46

74.20

       

6

1.60

-0.10

   

-5.9

   

1.8

 + 5.7

   

Ucak et al. [64]†

50

40

80

       

4.34

1.68

 + 0.08

   

-4.02

   

0.68

 + 4.12

   

Restrospective studies (n = 4)

César-Neto et al. [66]‡

3

0

0

     

5.83

 

0.33

 + 2.33

             

4

1

25

     

6.63

 

0

 + 4.13

             

Chao [36]†

36

      

15

41.70

15

3.60

2.40

   

-1.10 (15)

   

-3.8 (15)

0

   

 + 2.5 (15)

Esteibar et al. [67]‡

11

    

1

11

                  

102

    

84

82

                  

8

    

1

7

                  

Gil et al. [68]†

54

    

12

22.20

   

2.50

2.10

  

2.10

   

-2.10

 

1.80

  

 + 0.50

 
  1. pt, patient; NR, Not reported; Mo, Months; RC, Recession; PD, Probing depth; CAL, Clinical attachmente level; KTW, Keratinized tissue width
  2. Twenty-first century technique; Pre-twenty-first century technique;