Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparing oral health practices, oral health status, personal and pregnancy profile of the study participants in the two groups (N = 162)

From: Comparison of two minimally invasive restorative techniques in improving the oral health-related quality of life of pregnant women: a six months randomized controlled trial

 

Papacarie-Duo

ART

P

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Age

27.1 (2.82)

26.3 (3.18)

0.108a

No. of decayed teeth

2.91 (0.86)

2.71 (0.92)

0.150a

Gingival Index

1.54 (0.32)

1.43 (0.29)

0.025a*

Plaque Index

1.69 (0.34)

1.65 (0.29)

0.428a

Restoration success

68 (82.9%)

63 (78.8%)

0.499a

 

n (%)

n (%)

 

Education

  

0.744b

Primary/secondary education

60 (73.2%)

60 (75%)

 

University education

22 (26.8%)

20 (25%)

Stage of pregnancy

  

0.209b

First trimester

29 (35.4%)

21 (26.3%)

 

Second trimester

53 (64.6%)

59 (73.8%)

 

Order of pregnancy

  

0.719b

First child

23 (28%)

18 (22.5%)

 

Second child

35 (42.7%)

37 (46.3%)

 

Third or more

24 (29.3%)

25 (31.3%)

 

Brushing frequency

  

0.155b

Less than daily

38 (46.3%)

46 (57.5%)

 

Daily

44 (53.7%)

34 (42.5%)

 

Last dental visit

  

0.308b

Within the last year

39 (47.6%)

46 (57.5%)

 

More than one year

43 (52.4%)

34 (42.5%)

 

Perceived state of teeth

  

0.157b

Good/very good

32 (39%)

29 (36.3%)

 

Average

34 (41.5%)

29 (36.3%)

 

Poor/very poor

16 (19.5%)

22 (27.4%)

 
  1. *Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05
  2. aIndependent T test
  3. bChi square