Assessing the completeness of periodontal disease documentation in the EHR: a first step in measuring the quality of care

Table 2 Overall and component measure scores across the 4 institutions (n = number of patients meeting the denominator criteria in the respective reporting year)

	Overall measure (%)	A. Perio diagnosis (%)	B. Perio chart (%)	C. Perio risk (%)	C.1 homecare (%)	C.2 diabetes (%)	C.3 tobacco (%)
2015
Institution 1 (n = 6825)	16.44	43.22	54.90	26.81	33.44	62.68	62.36
Institution 2 (n = 3590)	0.64	3.26	32.67	3.59	4.48	86.24	78.61
Institution 3 (11,296)	29.57	48.57	66.47	49.96	55.21	69.87	69.65
Institution 4 (142,690)	99.22	99.90	99.40	99.82	99.86	99.88	99.86
2016
Institution 1 (n = 7379)	22.46	46.54	59.52	36.56	43.56	66.57	66.36
Institution 2 (n = 3762)	1.97	11.99	34.18	4.31	5.53	84.34	76.56
Institution 3 (n = 12,279)	26.58	43.85	65.65	51.20	56.16	69.62	69.39
Institution 4 (n = 151,824)	99.07	99.90	99.25	99.81	99.83	99.85	99.86
2017
Institution 1 (n = 6853)	23.96	47.23	62.95	40.07	47.05	69.71	70.26
Institution 2 (n = 3938)	0.89	10.46	36.52	4.06	5.13	82.58	75.24
Institution 3 (12,989)	24.92	42.01	66.90	46.24	51.67	68.33	68.07
Institution 4 (166,139)	99.34	99.90	99.53	99.80	99.81	99.83	99.83
2018
Institution 1 (n = 6452)	20.47	43.71	60.63	37.21	45.29	67.37	68.92
Institution 2 (n = 4411)	0.97	8.41	36	3.36	4.87	83.38	74.65
Institution 3 (n = 13,146)	22.27	37.86	69.57	46.18	52.69	67.62	67.12
Institution 4 (n = 177,441)	99.49	99.91	99.66	99.83	99.84	99.84	99.85

ISSN: 1472-6831