Skip to main content

Table 4 Statistical significance was found in pairwise comparisons

From: The relation between incisal guidance angle and the growth and development of temporomandibular joint: a multi-cross-sectional retrospective study

 

1

2

3

6–12

13–16

17–25

26–33

OPA

a v b

a v c

a v d

a v b

a v c

a v d

a v c

a v d

b v c

1 v 2

1 v 3

1 v 2

1 v 3

1 v 2

1 v 3

MS

         

1 v 2

     

LS

               

MIC

               

LIC

      

b v c

      

1 v 3

 

SS

      

a v d

        

AS

      

a v c

a v d

 

1 v 3

     

PS

a v b

        

1 v 3

 

2 v 3

   

AIC

a v c

a v d

 

a v c

a v d

 

a v c

a v d

       

PIC

               

HF

   

a v c

         

1 v 2

 

WF

               

AEI

             

1 v 2

1 v 3

LAC

a v b

a v c

a v d

a v b

a v c

a v d

a v c

a v d

       

MAC

a v c

a v d

       

1 v 2

2 v 3

    
  1. 1: IGA < 45°; 2: 45° ≤ IGA ≤ 60°; 3: IGA > 60°
  2. a: 6–12 years old group; b: 13–16 years old group; c: 17–25 years old group; d: 26–33 years old group
  3. OPA occlusal plane angle, MS medial space, LS lateral space, MIC medial inclination of the condyle, LIC lateral inclination of the condyle, SS superior space, AS anterior space, PS posterior space, AIC anterior inclination of the condyle, PIC posterior inclination of the condyle, HF height of the fossa, WF width of the fossa, AEI articular eminence inclination, LAC long axis of the condyle, MAC minor axis of the condyle