Themes | Sub themes | Topics within the theme | |
---|---|---|---|
Interviews with parents | Perceptions of SDF | Perceived advantages of SDF | Minimal child’s cooperation required Non-invasive stress-free treatment The possibility of saving the tooth from extraction Promoting good oral health |
Aesthetics | The black staining of arrested lesions Minimising the staining to improve acceptability | ||
Factors influencing decision making | Perceptions of others | Bullying at schools or nurseries Other people’s judgment | |
Relative visibility of the tooth | Anterior or posterior tooth | ||
Self-consciousness | Child’s age/gender’s impact on parent’s decision | ||
Longevity of tooth | Conflicting views on when SDF was most advantageous | ||
Relative merits of alternative approaches | Saving the tooth from extraction Avoiding GA Choosing between SDF and HT | ||
Preferences and recommendations of others involved in treatment | Child’s preferences Dentist’s recommendations | ||
Financial considerations | The cost to the NHS | ||
Child tolerance of treatment | Child’s sensitivity to strange smells or tastes | ||
Interviews with children | Child’s acceptability of SDF | Relative visibility of the tooth | Anterior or posterior tooth Size of the carious lesion |
Peers’ perceptions | Fears of bullying by peers at nurseries or schools | ||
Previous experience | Impact of previous dental treatment experience (positive and negative) on child’s treatment preferences |